*
Big banks pushing for relief on rules, oversight
*
Administration officials sound sympathetic to lighter
touch
*
Bank supervision, reporting requirements, stress tests in
focus
By Lananh Nguyen, Pete Schroeder and Tatiana Bautzer
NEW YORK, March 27 (Reuters) - U.S. banking giants are
pushing for a swath of lighter regulations from President Donald
Trump's administration, and say they are heartened by signals
that regulators are listening.
Bank bosses want to cut reporting requirements on some
transactions, limit regulators' enforcement powers, speed up
deal approvals and overhaul capital rules, four industry
executives told Reuters. Those asks would include raising the
bar on an anti-money-laundering rule requiring reporting of
$10,000 cash transactions and limiting the use of confidential
regulatory warnings, known as Matters Requiring Attention, two
of those sources said. Another major change could be watering
down annual stress tests, one of those sources said.
The industry has gotten encouraging signs from public
statements from the administration, even as bankers wait for
head regulators to be installed.
"There has been receptivity to our concerns," said Kevin
Fromer, head of the Financial Services Forum, which represents
the largest global banks and has been pushing for lighter
capital and supervisory controls. "We're at the early stages of
that conversation."
Public statements by regulators have indicated a change of
focus. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the Economic Club
of New York this month that the financial regulatory agenda
needed "a fundamental refocusing of supervisors' priorities,"
while Travis Hill, acting FDIC head, said at a bankers
conference in Washington that regulators need to be "more
focused on the real fundamental financial risks and less on the
administration around that."
REGULATORY CHANGE
The changes being pushed could amount to some of the
most significant bank deregulation in years. Most recently, some
larger banks saw rule relief in 2019 under a "tailoring" project
undertaken in the first Trump administration.
The wishlist for sweeping regulatory changes comes after the
industry fought Biden-era regulators who sought to implement
stricter capital rules known as Basel endgame last year. The
proposal was effectively scrapped in a major victory for banks,
and now the industry is seeking further relief.
Some bankers contend that regulators in recent years have
been unfairly heavy-handed even as large institutions report
robust earnings and show resilience through the pandemic and
2023 industry turmoil, when three regional lenders failed.
Still, proponents of tougher rules argue they provide
critical guardrails for the financial system, protecting
consumers and the broader economy.
"Financial rules protect Main Street families while
weakening them enrich Wall Street bankers," said Dennis
Kelleher, head of the advocacy group Better Markets, which
pushes for stricter financial rules.
Treasury spokespeople did not respond to a request for
comment.
Spokespeople for agencies that supervise banks - the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Federal Reserve -
declined to comment. The White House did not respond to a
request for comment.
SUPERVISION, ENFORCEMENT
Bank bosses have a broader, ambitious goal to water down
supervision and enforcement, three of the sources said. The
industry seeks to rein in regulators' focus to material
financial risks that can be quantified.
Banks have complained for years that examiners expanded
scrutiny far beyond core financial matters and into areas such
as corporate governance, computer systems and compensation,
according to the Bank Policy Institute, a trade association
representing large U.S. lenders.
Industry leaders aim to water down MRAs handed down by
regulators such as the Federal Reserve and the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), three sources said. Lenders
treat MRAs as urgent matters, devoting many employees to repair
work to avoid fines or other punishments.
BPI said some MRAs represented "illegal overreach" by
regulators, who should concentrate on material risks to banks'
financial condition.
Bessent echoed that concern in his New York speech, calling
on agencies to "drive a culture that focuses on material
financial risk rather than box checking."
Lenders are also pushing for a broad overhaul of the Fed's
so-called stress tests, an annual exercise aimed to measure
banks' abilities to handle potential crises. The Fed signaled
late last year it was open to changes to make the exam more
transparent. BPI led a lawsuit against the Fed late last year
demanding such changes.
'OUTDATED' CASH RULE
One of the easiest regulations to adjust could be an
anti-money laundering (AML) rule requiring banks to file reports
on customers who make more than $10,000 in cash transactions in
a day, according to one of the sources, an industry executive
who declined to be identified discussing supervisory matters.
That would require rewriting a rule within The Treasury
Department.
AML has been cited by lobby groups as contributing to
'debanking', or when a bank closes an individual's account.
President Donald Trump publicly complained of 'debanking' of
conservatives earlier this year.
"The requirements that we have ... under the anti
money-laundering laws and the various sanctions regimes, the
general laws globally are quite onerous," said Kathryn Ruemmler,
Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel of Goldman Sachs ( GS )
at a conference this month.
The industry has long complained that the limit is
outdated and generates unnecessary filings. It would welcome a
higher threshold such as $75,000 or even $100,000, the source
said.
One leading bank regulator has endorsed the idea. Rodney
Hood, the acting head of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, which monitors national banks, said in a statement to
Reuters that the current limit is "outdated and burdensome," and
backed an increase among other rule easings.
Congress is set to question Jonathan Gould, Trump's pick to
permanently lead the OCC, on Thursday.