June 2 (Reuters) - Retailer Bass Pro Shops and its
affiliate Cabela's have been accused in new lawsuit of scheming
with manufacturers, distributors and a trade group to charge
consumers artificially higher prices in the billion-dollar
archery and bowhunting industry.
The proposed class action, filed on Friday in the federal
district court in Utah, also named Dick's Sporting Goods, the
Archery Trade Association and several manufacturers and
distributors as participants in the alleged price-fixing scheme.
The Pennsylvania resident who filed the lawsuit alleged the
trade association drove an industry-wide campaign to establish
and enforce minimum advertised pricing policies. Those policies
violated U.S. antitrust law by preventing price competition
among retailers, the complaint alleged.
The lawsuit estimated there are hundreds of thousands of
potential class members who have purchased relevant archery
products since 2014.
"The alleged cartel in this case has illegally raised the
prices paid by American bowhunters and archers for a decade,"
said a lawyer for the plaintiffs, Gary Smith Jr, of law firm
Hausfeld. "This lawsuit aims to recover those overcharges for
the benefit of the alleged cartel's victims."
Bass Pro Shops, Dick's Sporting Goods and the Archery Trade
Association did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Bass Pro Shops acquired Cabela's in 2017.
Archery products distributor Lancaster Archery Supply,
another defendant, did not immediately respond to a similar
request.
The lawsuit said the Minnesota-based Archery Trade
Association played a central role in the alleged price-fixing
conspiracy. The group's membership, now at more than 2,500
organizations, includes manufacturers, distributors and
retailers.
Price competition among retailers was seen as an
"existential threat" to the industry, according to the lawsuit,
so the trade group and retailers allegedly agreed to implement
minimum advertised pricing as a measure to keep a level playing
field.
Some bows can cost hundreds of dollars, and arrows run more
than $100, according to the lawsuit. The products at issue also
include arrowheads and targets.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and a court
order prohibiting the alleged price-fixing conspiracy from
continuing.
The case is Joseph Santarlas v. Bowtech et al, U.S. District
Court, District of Utah, No. 2:25-cv-00436-DAK.
For plaintiff: Gary Smith Jr of Hausfeld; Jason Lichtman of
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein; David Kesselman of
Kesselman, Brantly, Stockinger; and Joshua Grabar of Graber Law
Office
For defendants: No appearances yet