WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of
Justice and 15 states on Thursday sued Apple ( AAPL ), alleging
it used the powerful demand for its iPhone and other products to
drive up prices for its services and hurt smaller rivals in the
first major antitrust effort against the smartphone maker by the
Biden administration.
Apple ( AAPL ) joins a list of major tech companies sued by U.S.
regulators, including Alphabet's Google, Meta
Platforms ( META ) and Amazon.com ( AMZN ) across the
administrations of both former President Donald Trump and
President Joe Biden.
"Consumers should not have to pay higher prices because
companies violate the antitrust laws," Attorney General Merrick
Garland said in a statement. "If left unchallenged, Apple ( AAPL ) will
only continue to strengthen its smartphone monopoly."
The Justice Department, which was also joined by the
District of Columbia in the lawsuit, alleges that Apple ( AAPL ) uses its
market power to get more money from consumers, developers,
content creators, artists, publishers, small businesses and
merchants.
The 88-page lawsuit, filed in U.S. federal court in Newark,
New Jersey, said it was focused on "freeing smartphone markets
from Apple's ( AAPL ) anticompetitive and exclusionary conduct and
restoring competition to lower smartphone prices for consumers,
reducing fees for developers, and preserving innovation for the
future."
In the lawsuit, the U.S. added that "Apple ( AAPL ) repeatedly
chooses to make its products worse for consumers to prevent
competition from emerging."
Apple ( AAPL ) disagreed in a statement, saying: "This lawsuit
threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple ( AAPL ) products
apart in fiercely competitive markets. If successful, it would
hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people
expect from Apple ( AAPL ) - where hardware, software, and services
intersect."
Apple ( AAPL ) shares were trading 3% lower.
Apple ( AAPL ) has already been subject to antitrust probes and
orders in Europe, Japan and Korea, as well as lawsuits from
corporate rivals such as Epic Games.
One of Apple's ( AAPL ) most lucrative businesses - its App Store,
which charges developers commissions of up to 30% - has already
survived a lengthy legal challenge under U.S. law by Epic. While
the lawsuit found that Apple ( AAPL ) did not violate antitrust laws, a
federal judge ordered Apple ( AAPL ) to allow links and buttons to pay
for apps without using Apple's ( AAPL ) in-app payment commission.
In Europe, Apple's ( AAPL ) App Store business model has been
dismantled by a new law called the Digital Markets Act that went
into effect earlier this month. Apple ( AAPL ) plans to let developers
offer their own app stores - and, importantly, pay no
commissions - but rivals such as Spotify and Epic argue Apple ( AAPL ) is
still making it too hard to offer alternative app stores.
The rulings on Apple's ( AAPL ) App Store forced the Justice
Department to look at Apple's ( AAPL ) other practices for the basis of a
complaint, such as how Apple ( AAPL ) allows outside firms to access the
chips and sensors in the iPhone.
Consumer hardware firms, such as smart-tracker maker Tile
Inc, have long complained that Apple ( AAPL ) has restricted the ways in
which they can work with the iPhone's sensors while developing
competing products that have greater access.
Apple ( AAPL ) began selling AirTags - which can be attached to items
like car keys to help users find them when they are lost -
several years after Tile had been selling a similar product.
Similarly, Apple ( AAPL ) has restricted access to a chip in the
iPhone that allows for contactless payments. Credit cards can
only be added to the iPhone by using Apple's ( AAPL ) own Apple Pay
service.
And Apple ( AAPL ) has also faced criticism over its iMessage
service, which only works on Apple ( AAPL ) devices.
Apple ( AAPL ) has long argued that it restricts access to some user
data and some of the iPhone's hardware by third-party developers
for privacy and security reasons.