*
Shareholders say Activision CEO prioritized own interests
*
Microsoft ( MSFT ) wins dismissal of aiding-and-abetting claims
*
$75.4 billion takeover closed on October 2023
(Updates with comment from Kotick's counsel in paragraphs 5-6,
comment from Microsoft ( MSFT ) in paragraph 11)
By Jonathan Stempel
Oct 3 (Reuters) - A Delaware judge said former
Activision Blizzard officials including Chief Executive Bobby
Kotick must face most of a lawsuit alleging they shortchanged
shareholders when Microsoft ( MSFT ) bought the "Call of Duty"
game maker for $75.4 billion.
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Chancery
Court said on Thursday the shareholders in the proposed class
action can pursue their "core" claim that Kotick and other
Activision directors breached their fiduciary duties. She
dismissed two claims against Microsoft ( MSFT ).
Shareholders led by Swedish pension fund Sjunde AP-Fonden
accused Kotick of rushing into the merger so he could keep his
job and $400 million of change-of-control benefits, and insulate
himself from claims he knew about widespread sexual harassment
at Activision.
They also said the $95 per share takeover price was too low
from the outset, and looked worse as Activision's performance
improved during the 21-month regulatory approval process for the
merger, which closed in October 2023.
In an October 7 letter sent after publication of this
article, Kotick's defamation counsel disputed claims of
widespread harassment at Activision.
"Not a single investigation, court finding, verdict, or
ruling ever concluded that there was any merit" to the
allegations of widespread harassment at Activision, Tom Clare
and Nick Brechbill of Clare Locke wrote.
In an 83-page decision, McCormick found sufficient
allegations that Kotick manipulated the sale process to favor
Microsoft ( MSFT ), which "offered speed, deal certainty, and--inferably
a friendly landing place."
She also found it reasonably conceivable that Activision
directors put Kotick's interests ahead of those of shareholders,
including by allowing a lowball takeover price while harassment
concerns were depressing Activision's stock.
She dismissed claims that Microsoft ( MSFT ) aided and abetted the
alleged breaches, even if the Redmond, Washington-based company
may have "passively stood by" while they occurred. She also
dismissed other claims against the Activision defendants.
"Litigation on the merits of a trimmed-down version of the
plaintiff's complaint can now launch," McCormick wrote. "Game
on."
A Microsoft ( MSFT ) spokesperson said that the company believes
the remaining claims will be disproved. "This acquisition was
fairly negotiated and delivered great value to Activision's
shareholders," the spokesperson added.
The shareholders' lawyers did not respond to requests for
comment.
The case is Sjunde AP-Fonden v Activision Blizzard Inc et
al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 2022-1001.