*
Arm could force Qualcomm ( QCOM ) to destroy Nuvia technology
*
Arm says Qualcomm ( QCOM ) violated their licensing agreement
*
Qualcomm ( QCOM ) argues Arm's new CEO seeks higher royalties
By Tom Hals
Dec 19 (Reuters) - Lawyers for Arm Holdings
and Qualcomm ( QCOM ) are set to make closing arguments
on Friday in a case that could upend Qualcomm's ( QCOM ) push into the PC
market with a chip meant to rival Apple ( AAPL ) and Intel ( INTC ) on speed.
An eight-person jury in a U.S. federal court in Delaware
will determine whether Qualcomm ( QCOM ) or Nuvia, a startup Qualcomm ( QCOM )
purchased for $1.4 billion in 2021, breached a license agreement
with U.K.-based Arm, which supplies intellectual property to
both firms.
If Arm is victorious, the British firm could force Qualcomm ( QCOM )
to destroy the technology it purchased from Nuvia, which has
become the basis of a chip released this year that Microsoft ( MSFT )
and the entire Windows PC industry had hoped would claw
back market share lost to Apple ( AAPL ).
The dispute centers on the royalties that chip companies pay
on each semiconductor made using Arm's technology. Before its
acquisition by Qualcomm ( QCOM ), Nuvia's license agreement required it
to pay far higher royalty rates than Qualcomm ( QCOM ).
After Qualcomm ( QCOM ) bought Nuvia, it aimed to use Nuvia's
technology in its chips while paying the lower royalties due
under its own agreement with Arm. Arm objected, kicking off a
dispute that led Arm to sue Qualcomm ( QCOM ) in 2022.
In a trial that started Monday, Arm sought to portray
Qualcomm's ( QCOM ) moves as a first-of-its-kind flouting of standard
contractual terms the British company had used successfully for
decades and that would have upended its business model.
Qualcomm ( QCOM ), by contrast, portrayed Arm as a longtime vendor
whose new CEO had ambitions to reap higher royalty rates and
compete against Qualcomm ( QCOM ) by starting to design its own chip.
Documents and testimony also showed that San Diego,
California-based Qualcomm ( QCOM ) estimated it could eventually save
$1.4 billion per year in payments to Arm by switching to Nuvia's
technology as it pushed into new markets. Its executives
repeatedly testified that their plans did not violate license
agreements.
The jury must determine if Qualcomm ( QCOM ) and Nuvia breached the
deals and whether Arm met its obligations under the agreements.
During the trial, jurors were shown contract language
that appeared to give Arm sweeping license rights to products
built using its instructions, which could have implications for
Arm's agreements with other chipmakers. Qualcomm ( QCOM ) executives
testified that such a reading of the language ignored that its
license covered the extensive design work done by Qualcomm ( QCOM )
engineers to create almost entirely new products.
A verdict in the trial, which started on Monday and was set
to last five days, could come as early as Thursday.