*
Judge says evidence shows Zuckerberg involved in AI
training
decisions
*
Prominent litigator David Boies joins authors' legal team
By Blake Brittain
Sept 25 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms ( META ) has lost a
bid to block a group of U.S. authors from questioning Meta CEO
Mark Zuckerberg in a lawsuit accusing the company of misusing
copyrighted books to train its artificial intelligence systems.
Zuckerberg's deposition is justified based on evidence that
he was directly involved in Meta's AI-training decisions, U.S.
Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson in San Francisco said on Tuesday.
The lawsuit was filed against Meta last year by a group of
authors including comedian Sarah Silverman. It alleges that the
company infringed their copyrights by using their books to train
AI language models. The writers have also brought a similar,
ongoing case against Microsoft ( MSFT )-backed OpenAI.
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who is presiding over
the Meta case, separately allowed prominent litigator David
Boies and other attorneys from his firm Boies Schiller Flexner
to join the authors' legal team on Tuesday.
Chhabria had criticized the authors' lead attorney Joseph
Saveri about the handling of the case during a Friday
conference, according to the court's docket, warning against
proceeding without "a newly constituted team."
Saveri said in a statement on the Boies firm's addition that
he "look forward to joining our collective expertise and
experience to continue to prosecute this novel, important case
to a successful conclusion."
He declined to comment on the Zuckerberg deposition.
Spokespeople and an attorney for Meta did not immediately
respond to a request for comment on the orders on Wednesday.
Several groups of copyright owners including writers, visual
artists and music publishers have sued major tech companies over
the unauthorized use of their work to train generative AI
systems. The companies have argued that their AI training is
protected by the copyright doctrine of fair use, and that the
lawsuits threaten the burgeoning AI industry.
Meta asked the court for an order barring the authors from
deposing Zuckerberg in their case and said they lacked "any
substantiation for their belief that Mr. Zuckerberg has any
special knowledge of this dispute."
But Hixson said on Tuesday that the authors provided
evidence that Zuckerberg was "the chief decision maker and
policy setter for Meta's Generative AI branch and the
development of the large language models at issue in this
action."
The case is Kadrey v. Meta Platforms Inc ( META ), U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California, No.
3:23-cv-03417.
For the authors: Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law
Firm; Matthew Butterick; and David Boies of Boies Schiller &
Flexner
For Meta: Bobby Ghajar of Cooley
Read more:
Sarah Silverman sues Meta, OpenAI for copyright infringement
US judge trims AI copyright lawsuit against Meta
(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington)