Dec 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Department of Justice antitrust
head Jonathan Kanter said on Tuesday that he will step down on
Friday, capping off a three-year tenure in which he aimed to
reinvigorate competition law in the U.S..
Kanter and his counterpart at the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, Lina Khan, have sought to revive antitrust
enforcement in the U.S. as a check on corporate power, drawing
praise from Democrats and some Republicans.
"Plutocracy is its own kind of dictatorship," Kanter said in
a farewell address on Tuesday. "When companies larger and more
powerful than most world governments threaten individual liberty
with coercive private taxation and regulation, it threatens our
way of life," he said.
Some attorneys and business groups have criticised Khan and
Kanter's agenda and supported a return to a more limited view of
antitrust that has prevailed for four decades.
But President-elect Donald Trump's antitrust picks are not
seen as likely to drastically curtail enforcement.
Gail Slater, an aide to incoming Vice President JD Vance, is
poised to take over for Kanter once she is confirmed. Before
being tapped as Trump's running mate, Vance praised Khan's
efforts and said that corporations can engage in "tyrannical"
behavior.
At least until Trump takes office, Kanter's deputy Doha
Mekki will lead the antitrust division. After that point, Trump
could appoint a different acting head of the division.
Kanter has kicked the DOJ's antitrust division into high
gear, bringing cases against Apple ( AAPL ), Alphabet's Google
, Ticketmaster and Visa, and winning a
groundbreaking legal victory over Google in a case over its
dominance in online search that was brought during
President-elect Donald Trump's first administration.
The DOJ under Kanter also brought cases that successfully
block a tie up between JetBlue and American, JetBlue's proposed
$3.8 billion merger with Spirit Airlines and the $2.2 billion
merger of Penguin Random House, the world's largest book
publisher, and rival Simon & Schuster.
Kanter warned in his speech that the DOJ's antitrust work
faces an existential threat without full access to funding from
the merger filing fees it collects.