SAO PAULO, June 3 - Brazilian prosecutors are seeking to
annul a $180 million carbon offset scheme supporting
conservation of the Amazon ( AMZN ) rainforest, which the state of Para
signed last year with a coalition of major corporations and
foreign governments, according to a lawsuit filed on Tuesday.
The case could be a blow to the government of Para, which is
hosting this year's United Nations climate summit, known as
COP30, as well as the wider carbon credit market, which has
looked to government programs as a way to address concerns about
fraud and abuse.
Amazon.com Inc ( AMZN ) and at least five other companies
had agreed to purchase the credits through the LEAF Coalition
forest conservation initiative, which the e-commerce
giant helped to found in 2021 with a group of other firms and
governments, including the United States and United Kingdom.
The state of Para had aimed to sell up to 12 million credits
at $15 each, representing the value of carbon stored in trees
that the project would save from deforestation through 2026.
In the filing, prosecutors argued that the state government
had failed to inform and consult traditional communities that
would be impacted by the deal. They also said Brazilian law does
not allow for the pre-sale of carbon credits.
Prosecutors accused the state of rushing to approve the plan
"before COP30, which has generated considerable pressure on
Indigenous peoples and traditional communities in Para."
The government of Para dismissed the allegations by
prosecutors, saying that it is planning 47 consultations with
communities that may be affected by the project, none of which
are obligated to participate.
The state government also said in a statement that any sales
will only be finalized when emission reductions are verified and
credits are formally issued.
Emergent, a non-profit group that coordinates the LEAF
Coalition, did not immediately reply to requests for comment.
The Para state project was one of the world's first
"jurisdictional" carbon credit schemes, covering a whole state
or country in order to address concerns about the impact and
credibility of projects that rely on private landowners.