(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, the
director of the Geoeconomics Program of the Center for the Study
of Democracy.)
By Martin Vladimirov
SOFIA, Sept 10 (Reuters) - Nearly four years after
Europe's energy crisis erupted in late 2021, the continent has
moved from emergency response to system redesign. But the
European Union is not out of the woods. Deep vulnerabilities
persist, and progress toward clean, secure and affordable supply
is highly uneven across the continent.
The Energy and Climate Security Risk Index (ECSRI), developed by
the Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD), measures energy
security across four pillars: geopolitics, affordability,
reliability and sustainability. Its findings reveal a widening
energy security divide between leaders like France, Sweden and
Denmark and laggards such as Hungary, Italy and Bulgaria.
Europe's biggest success on the energy security front has
been reducing dependence on Russian fossil fuels. Gas imports
from Russia have fallen from about 40% of EU supply in 2021 to
around 10% in 2025, according to Eurostat. EU members achieved
this by boosting purchases from the U.S., Norway and Qatar.
Countries such as Italy and Germany that used to be some of
the biggest consumers of Russian energy have almost ceased
Russian gas imports, but several nations in Central Europe
remain highly exposed. Hungary still buys more than
three-quarters of its gas from Russia, based on estimates using
Eurostat data, and Slovakia remains tied to Russia's Gazprom
contracts.
New dependencies are also emerging, however.
First, the EU now gets much of its liquefied natural gas
(LNG) from the U.S., leaving it vulnerable in future
negotiations with Washington on trade or other matters.
Additionally, Europe's rapid buildout of solar, wind and
battery infrastructure has increased Europe's reliance on
Chinese supply chains.
China dominates refining of many critical minerals. It processes
over 60% of global lithium, 80% of cobalt, and around 70% of
rare earths, all critical for the EU energy sector. Without
diversification, Europe risks replacing one dependency with
another.
Yet Europe is not without options. France has significantly
increased its silicon refining capacity for solar manufacturing,
while Sweden already supplies up to 90% of the EU's domestically
produced iron ore and is expanding its copper and zinc output.
Portugal is developing vast lithium reserves, and Finland hosts
major nickel and zinc refineries.
In the EU's neighbourhood, Serbia's Jadar mine could meet
nearly 90% of Europe's lithium current needs if commissioned,
though those needs are expected to rise significantly in the
coming years. Ukraine is also believed to hold significant
titanium and rare earth deposits, but whether these can be mined
and processed profitably remains an open question.
AFFORDABILITY CHALLENGES
If geopolitics defined energy policy in 2022, affordability
is now the central challenge. Affordability risks in Europe have
surged fivefold since 2020 largely due to the price shocks
following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Retail power and gas bills remain 40-70% above pre-crisis
levels in Southern and Eastern Europe, with coal-heavy Poland,
Bulgaria and the Czech Republic the most vulnerable, based on an
analysis of Eurostat data. Nordic countries and France, with
less-carbon-intensive systems, face much lower affordability
risks.
European industry remains under significant pressure due to high
energy costs. Between 2021 and 2024, more than 1 million
industrial jobs disappeared from Europe, largely due to elevated
energy costs. Without long-term clean power contracts and
stronger efficiency measures, Europe risks losing
competitiveness.
RELIABILITY ISSUES
The nature of energy reliability risks has also shifted in
Europe. In an energy system dominated by fossil fuels, the
challenge was securing supply. Today, the problem is that
renewables are being rapidly integrated into grids without the
infrastructure to underpin them.
A clear example of this was the blackout that struck the
Iberian Peninsula in April. The sudden loss of 15 gigawatts of
solar power overwhelmed systems dominated by inverter-based
generation that lacked sufficient backup.
Wealthier states like Germany and the Netherlands are
investing in digitalised grids, interconnections and storage.
However, in Central and Eastern Europe, outdated grids and
limited investment leave energy systems exposed to future
outages.
SUSTAINABILITY GAP
On sustainability, the EU has set ambitious goals through
the Green Deal, Fit for 55 and REPowerEU. But implementation is
uneven across the region.
For example, Sweden, Denmark and Finland have combined
renewables, industrial decarbonisation and strong governance to
reduce their risk here. And France benefits from nuclear power,
which has kept a lid on emissions and costs.
In contrast, many Central and Eastern members are
constrained by legacy infrastructure and weaker governance. In
turn, they are seeing both emissions and energy costs rise.
Importantly, the ECSRI suggests that energy risks tend to
cluster, as countries with high sustainability risks also
typically face affordability and geopolitical challenges. Those
integrating clean energy, industrial strategy and grid
investment are more resilient across the board.
The past four years proved Europe can act in crisis, but the
next phase of the energy transition will require more than just
reactive policy. It will demand a long-term coherent strategy
and better coordination across the region - a heavy lift. But
the energy security data make one thing clear: without closing
the energy policy divide, Europe's prosperity and sovereignty
remain at risk.
(The views expressed here are those of Martin Vladimirov,
Director of the Geoeconomics Program of the Center for the Study
of Democracy (CSD)).
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest
(ROI), your essential new source for global financial
commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis
of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving
faster than ever. ROI, can help you keep up. Follow ROI
on LinkedIn, and X.
(Writing by Martin Vladimirov; Editing by Anna Szymanski and
Marguerita Choy)