(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters.)
*
Chinese firm dominate wind supply chain from turbines to
magnets
*
Europe weighs allowing Chinese firms access to
infrastructure
*
Britain to decide on future of Ming Yang's Scotland plant
By Ron Bousso
LONDON, Oct 23 (Reuters) - European governments seeking
to expand offshore wind power are increasingly wary of Chinese
companies' involvement. Countering China's dominance will be
time-consuming and expensive, but political pressure and
national security concerns may give the region little choice.
Offshore wind is a cornerstone of northern Europe's clean
energy strategy, offering a reliable alternative for more windy
and less sunny countries striving to cut greenhouse gas
emissions and reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels.
Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Europe has
dramatically slashed its purchases of Moscow's oil and gas, but
it has mostly replaced this with imports of U.S. liquefied
natural gas, meaning it has traded one dependence for another.
However, wind technology also relies on a foreign power,
given China's central role in the wind power supply chain from
rare earth magnets to turbines and blades. The role of China in
this sector has become a source of debate between European
governments and the industry.
Nowhere more so than in Britain, which aims to triple its
offshore wind generation by 2030 to between 43 and 50 gigawatts
from around 15GW today.
Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Ming Yang Smart Energy
announced on October 10 plans to invest up to $2 billion in a
plant in Scotland, just a month after Britain's largest
electricity supplier Octopus Energy signed an agreement with
Ming Yang to explore opportunities to develop 6 GW of wind.
In its announcement, Ming Yang said the turbine
manufacturing facility at Ardersier still requires the British
government's approval.
TRICKY TIMING
Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces a challenging decision.
Approving this major wind deal should support the government's
green energy ambitions and hopes to tighten trade relations with
Beijing, but it also risks running afoul of the growing push for
energy nationalism.
Ming Yang faces no direct allegations that it poses a
security threat.
Starmer's government already faces political backlash from
prosecutors' decision earlier this month to abandon the trial of
two British men charged with spying for China in parliament. At
the same time, U.S. President Donald Trump has urged countries
to avoid doing business with China as trade tensions between the
world's two largest economies deepen.
Beijing, on its part, is unhappy with the British
government's continued delays to approve plans for a new Chinese
embassy in London.
So while Britain might welcome Ming Yang's investment on
economic grounds, giving a Chinese firm a central role in the
development of critical UK energy infrastructure is bound to
spark further political debate.
GONE WITH THE WIND
Britain is not the only country rethinking China's role in its
wind industry. The European Commission last year launched a
review into Chinese turbine manufacturers in response to
industry concerns that cheaper imports could threaten the
competitiveness of European firms.
Additionally, in August, Hamburg-based asset manager Luxcara
scrapped a deal with Ming Yang to supply turbines for its
Germany North Sea wind farm.
To be sure, investor enthusiasm for the offshore wind sector,
once seen as the posterchild of the energy transition, has ebbed
in recent years due to rising costs and regulatory
uncertainties. President Trump's personal dislike of "windmills"
has further undermined the industry, which in the past year has
seen huge projects shelved from the U.S. East Coast to Britain,
Poland, Taiwan and South Korea.
The International Energy Agency recently revised lower its
forecast for growth in offshore wind over the next 5 years by
25% to 140 GW due to cost challenges and policy changes in the
United States.
But given Northern Europe's geography, wind remains one of
its best clean energy options. The continent is expected to add
43 GW of offshore wind capacity over the next five years, nearly
doubling its total installed capacity to 80 GW, according to
industry group WindEurope.
IT COMES WITH A COST
While China is the world's biggest deployer of offshore wind
technology, it does not dominate the industry as decisively as
the solar market. Chinese turbine manufacturers already face
strong competition from European rivals including Vestas and
Siemens Gamesa.
Chinese turbines costs can be 30% to 40% lower than their
European peers, according to consultancy Rystad Energy, but the
price advantage in Europe is likely inflated, as
European-supplied turbines benefit from lower transport costs
and premiums for insurance and financing.
And then there is the looming concern about cybersecurity
risks. Turbine manufacturers typically supply the software to
manage offshore wind farms and the connections with power grids.
With cybersecurity becoming a central strategic concern -
particularly with the rapid growth in artificial intelligence -
western governments may be increasingly wary of allowing Chinese
firms access to their most critical energy infrastructure.
DIVERSIFICATION
To reduce this dependency, European governments could put in
place policies and subsidies to encourage the further
development of domestic supply chains, particularly for complex
components such as turbines and software technologies.
But this will, of course, take time.
Additionally, western turbine manufacturers still need
access to rare earth metals and magnets. The production of which
is, once again, dominated by China.
That dependence could fade if western governments
successfully develop independent rare earth supply chains, but
again, that isn't going to happen overnight.
Wind power may ultimately help Europe develop affordable,
secure and clean energy, but China's current dominance of this
industry means Europe's path to this goal will be anything but
straightforward.
Want to receive my column in your inbox every Monday and
Thursday, along with additional energy insights and links to
trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),your
essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI
delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are
moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI
on LinkedIn and X.
(Ron Bousso, Editing by Louise Heavens)