LONDON, May 22 (Reuters) - It's forty-five years since
anyone built a primary aluminium smelter in the United States.
When Alumax fired up the Mt Holly plant in South Carolina in
1980, the country's tally of smelters rose to 33 with combined
annual capacity of almost five million metric tons of aluminium.
Today that number has shrunk to six. Two are fully
curtailed. Two, including Mt Holly, are running below capacity.
Annual production has shrunk to 700,000 tons.
Emirates Global Aluminium hopes to reverse the tide with a
new plant in Oklahoma. It joins Century Aluminum ( CENX ), which
was awarded federal funding by the Joe Biden administration for
a new "green" low-carbon smelter somewhere in the
Ohio/Mississippi River Basins.
Both projects face the same dilemma. High power prices
killed off most of the country's smelters and a lack of
competitively priced power has deterred anyone from building one
since the last century.
It doesn't help that any smelter project must compete for
electricity with tech companies willing to pay almost anything
for their power-hungry data centres.
NO POWER, NO METAL
Aluminium compounds have been around since ancient times,
used by the Egyptians as a dye-fixer and the Persians for
pottery.
But it wasn't until the early 19th century that anyone
worked out how to refine bauxite into metal and even then it
remained something of an expensive curiosity. Global production
was just two tons in 1869 and aluminium was more valuable than
gold.
The solution, discovered independently by Charles Martin
Hall in the United States and Paul Héroult in France, was to use
electrolysis on an intermediate product called alumina.
The Hall-Héroult process is still the dominant technology in
producing a metal that is now ubiquitous in buildings, vehicles
and consumer packaging. And it needs a lot of uninterrupted
power.
It takes 14,821 kilowatt-hours of electricity to make a ton
of aluminium, according to the U.S. Aluminum Association. A
modern-size smelter with annual capacity of 750,000 tons needs
more power than a city the size of Boston.
That's a big challenge for any primary aluminium producer in
the United States given the Energy Information Administration
estimates that the country will be facing an energy deficit of
31 million megawatt-hours by 2030 and 48 million by 2035.
ALUMINIUM VERSUS AI
The power is available right now to build a new U.S.
aluminium smelter, according to Matt Aboud, Senior Vice
President of Strategy & Business Development at Century
Aluminum ( CENX ).
The problem, he explained at last week's CRU Aluminium
Conference in London, is that it isn't available at a fixed
long-term price, which is what a smelter needs to lock in its
profitability and pay back construction costs that will run into
the billions of dollars.
The Aluminum Association estimates that a new U.S. smelter
would need a minimum 20-year power contract at a price of not
more than $40 per MWh to be viable at current aluminium prices.
Any smelter project is in a race with Big Tech, which is on
the same hunt for energy to power its next-generation artificial
intelligence data centres.
And tech companies "have no limit on what they are prepared
to pay for dependable 24/7 electricity", according to the
Aluminum Association's just-released report on rebuilding U.S.
supply chain resilience.
The Association estimates Microsoft ( MSFT ) conceded $115
per MWh in its deal with Constellation Energy ( CEG ) to restart
the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania.
Even reactivating moth-balled aluminium lines will be
challenging given the 2023 price of power averaged $73.42 per
MWh in the four U.S. states hosting smelters with idle capacity,
it warned.
'WHERE THE WIND COMES SWEEPING DOWN THE PLAIN'
EGA hasn't yet signed a power deal for its proposed
600,000-ton-per-year smelter in Oklahoma. Final go-ahead is
contingent on an agreed "power solution framework based on a
special rate offer from the Public Service Company of Oklahoma,"
according to the Memorandum of Understanding signed by state
governor Kevin Stitt.
Oklahoma has the advantage of producing almost three times
more energy than it consumes, according to the EIA.
Around half of the state's electricity generation was
sourced from natural gas in 2023, with wind power accounting for
another 42%. Indeed, Oklahoma is the third largest wind power
state after Texas and Iowa.
Harnessing intermittent wind power to run an aluminium
smelter, however, would take a massive amount of grid storage
capacity, meaning there would likely have to be some gas in the
energy mix for any new smelter.
That's better than coal but not ideal in an industry which
is collectively trying to lower its carbon footprint to produce
"green" aluminium.
DON'T CHUCK IT!
Even assuming EGA can get a viable long-term power deal, the
$4 billion project will only pour its first hot metal some time
near the end of the decade.
By which time, 14 new re-melt facilities will have started
up, lifting U.S. demand for recyclable scrap aluminium to 6.5
million tons, according to the Aluminum Association's
projections.
Recycling requires much less power, typically around 5% of
that required to produce virgin metal, and comes at a much lower
capital cost.
The main constraint on U.S. secondary production growth is a
shortage of "scrap".
The country has an astonishingly low beverage can recycling
rate of just 43% and throws away the equivalent of 800,000 tons
of aluminium every year.
It also exports huge amounts of end-of-life aluminium scrap.
Exports rose by 17% year-on-year to 2.4 million tons in 2024,
much of it destined for China, which is increasingly hungry for
recyclable raw material.
Capturing more recyclable material at home and sending less
of it abroad would be a complementary strategy for reducing
import dependency of a metal classified as critical by every
U.S. government agency.
It's also likely to be faster and cheaper than waiting to
see if either EGA or Century can win the battle with Big Tech
for enough power to build a new primary smelter.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters.
(Editing by Mark Potter)