(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters)
*
Chinese buyers of US LNG could divert cargoes to Europe
*
China's share of US LNG offtake set to grow
*
Tit-for-tat tariffs could impact new US LNG projects
By Ron Bousso
LONDON, Feb 6 - The burgeoning trade war between the
United States and China has caught American gas exporters in the
crossfire as they face the prospect of losing their edge in the
world's fastest-growing LNG market.
Buyers of U.S. fuel will likely respond by redirecting more
supply to Europe, where gas prices are today stronger than in
Asia, a short-term solution that could even benefit Chinese
traders.
Beijing slapped a 15% tariff on imports of U.S. liquefied
natural gas, after U.S. President Donald Trump announced last
Saturday that he was placing a 10% charge on all Chinese
imports.
This move will have minimal impact on China's energy
markets, given that U.S. LNG represents only 5.5%, or 4.3
million metric tons, of its total LNG imports, according to
Kpler data.
But the effect on U.S. gas exporters could be far greater if
these tariffs prove durable.
Until recently, Asia, and China in particular, were
considered key growth markets for the rapidly expanding U.S. LNG
sector, which is expected to see supply double to around 200
million tons per year (mtpa) by 2028 from 100 mtpa currently,
according to LSEG data.
China's share of U.S. LNG offtake is set to grow sharply.
Chinese importers have committed to buying nearly 20 million
metric tons per year from existing and new U.S. export terminals
in contracts that often exceed 20 years, according to Reuters
calculations.
Such long-term contracts are vital for U.S. companies
seeking to secure financing for expensive LNG production
facilities. A China-U.S. trade war would likely dampen Chinese
companies' appetite to sign further supply contracts, casting
doubt on the viability of the next wave of U.S. projects that
would start towards the end of the decade.
President Trump once famously quipped that "trade wars are
good and easy to win", but identifying any long-term winners
here is likely to prove challenging.
(Writing by Ron Bousso; editing by David Evans)