*
Lawsuits, unease with Elliott affiliate's bid stall
auction
*
US judge to hold hearing on Dec 13 to decide how to
proceed
*
Creditors want Citgo's financial documents reopened to
bidders,
Amber's period of exclusivity terminated
*
Gold Reserve ( GDRZF ), Venezuela signal potential bids if
restrictions
lifted
By Marianna Parraga and Gary McWilliams
HOUSTON, Nov 18 (Reuters) - Companies seeking to claim
proceeds from a court auction of shares in a parent of
Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum are pressing a U.S. court to
lift an exclusivity deal with an affiliate of Elliott Investment
Management, which could pave the way for at least two new bids,
sources close to the matter said.
The auction of shares in the U.S. oil refiner's parent PDV
Holding, aimed at paying 18 creditors up to $21.3 billion in
awards against Venezuela, has become stalled.
A conditional $7.3 billion
bid
in September by Elliott's wholly-owned Amber Energy for
Venezuela's foreign crown jewel has been criticized by many of
the creditors as inadequate and lawsuits by holders of
Venezuelan bonds and notes are threatening to upend the
seven-year-long court process.
Judge Leonard Stark, who is overseeing the case in a federal
court in Delaware, this month said he would soon set a path for
the auction to move ahead, and set a Dec. 13 hearing to listen
to arguments.
Stark has been asked by creditors to reopen a data room to
provide access to Citgo's financial documents to bidders, and
terminate a period of exclusivity held by Amber Energy,
according to court filings.
At least two companies have told the court they could
present new bids once restrictions are lifted.
Canadian miner Gold Reserve ( GDRZF ), which submitted bids in
the auction's first and second rounds, wants to revive a
proposal that was set aside in August by a court officer
managing the process. The officer had asked Gold Reserve ( GDRZF ) to
partner with U.S. oil refiner CVR Energy ( CVI ), which had
separately bid, but gave Amber exclusive negotiating rights
shortly after.
Lawyers representing Venezuela also told the court they
wanted to reserve the right to make a future bid to purchase the
shares or to submit "more effective and equitable" proposals
than a sale.
Amber did not reply to written questions. The company has
told the court in recent weeks its bid would deliver the highest
value for the shares, given the many challenges surrounding the
process.
Its $7.3 billion bid values Citgo at 5.9 times Citgo's last
12-month pre-tax earnings plus cash and debt, below the market's
6.9 times earnings average multiple for three big,
publicly-traded rivals, according to financial firm Tudor,
Pickering, Holt.
"I can see why the creditors want a better number," said
Tudor, Pickering refining analyst Matthew Blair.
The auction is expected to be the culmination of a
long-standing case first introduced by Canadian miner Crystallex
in Delaware in 2017 that made Citgo's parent liable for
Venezuela's debts. The judge wants to maximize sale proceeds to
pay off as many creditors as possible.
NEW BIDS?
Stark first must decide on two proposals - one by a court
officer appointed to oversee the auction and another by creditor
ConocoPhillips ( COP ) - that would both essentially block
creditors from resorting to other courts in pursuit of the same
assets. He is expected to rule on those motions in the coming
weeks.
If the proposals are rejected, Amber can walk away from the
process, according to an agreement it reached with the court
officer, Robert Pincus.
Amber's original bid has not been accepted by the judge. In
response to criticisms, Pincus last month presented a second bid
by Amber modifying the structure of the payment waterfall, which
would free about $5 billion for creditor payouts after the
process is completed.
Amber's bid was being treated as "a stalking horse bid" -
one that generally sets a minimum price in bankruptcy auctions -
a person close to the matter said, adding that the lack of
details provided about the bid made it difficult to match.
Another source said payout restrictions in Amber's bid would
likely encourage other bids. Some companies say they can beat
the Amber bid.
"Assuming the data room is reopened immediately, there
should be no impediment to finalizing the terms of a materially
superior Gold Reserve ( GDRZF ) bid," an attorney for the mining firm told
the court in a filing in October.
The company's prior bid was and remains "demonstrably
superior to the Elliott bid in every material category," its
filing said.
CVR is not expected to continue bidding, according to a
person familiar with the matter. Neither Gold Reserve ( GDRZF ) nor CVR
Energy ( CVI ) responded to requests for comment.
CREDITORS PROTEST
Amber's bid includes set-asides and deductions that have
been criticized by many of the 18 creditors seeking proceeds.
"The Elliott bid is non-viable," said creditors Gold
Reserve ( GDRZF ), Rusoro, Tidewater, Red Tree, Contrarian and Valores
Mundiales in a joint argument.
Some parties protested that the bid's structure would not
guarantee payments to the highest-ranked creditors - Crystallex,
Tidewater and ConocoPhillips ( COP ).
Companies further down the creditors' list "would receive
interests in a trust that may not pay them for years - if ever,"
said lower-ranked creditors Red Tree and Contrarian.
Several questioned whether Amber's bid met conditions set by
the court. If Amber's bid included a credit bid from the
acquisition of claims by Koch Industries that are low in the
ranking, it would require the payment in cash of all claims
above it in the creditors' list.
If creditors continue opposing bids, the court could be
motivated to consider other alternatives, including a
bankruptcy-like restructuring plan that would keep Citgo intact
and provide a larger payout to creditors over time, analysts
said.