*
In two large studies of heart attack survivors,
beta-blocker
drugs benefited those with mildly impaired heart function
*
Contradictory trial results seen in patients without heart
dysfunction
*
More data on beta-blockers in patients with normally
functioning
hearts expected in November
By Nancy Lapid
Aug 30 (Reuters) - A decades-old pill remains helpful
for heart attack patients even with modern treatments that can
prevent lasting damage to heart muscle, two large trials have
shown.
Still unclear is whether all patients, or only some, benefit
from so-called beta-blocker drugs, which are typically
prescribed to everyone after a heart attack.
Two sharply contradictory reports were presented on Saturday
at a large cardiology meeting in Madrid and published in The New
England Journal of Medicine.
"It is not unusual for trials to yield different results,"
said Dr. Borja Ibanez of Centro Nacional de Investigaciones
Cardiovasculares Carlos III in Madrid, who led one of the
trials.
"Somewhat uncommon is to see two trials with apparently
divergent findings presented on the same day."
Most important, Ibanez said, is the finding both teams agree
on, which is that beta-blockers reduce the combined risk of
another heart attack, heart failure, or death in patients
without heart failure but with mildly impaired heart function.
The question is whether the pills are beneficial or useless
for those with normally functioning hearts, who account for
about 80% of patients after a first heart attack.
Beta-blocker manufacturers include Mylan, Novartis,
Pfizer ( PFE ), Abbott, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
, Amneal Pharmaceuticals ( AMRX ), Sun Pharmaceutical
Industries, Lupin, ANI Pharmaceuticals ( ANIP ), and
Eagle Pharmaceuticals ( EGRX ).
The drugs work by inhibiting the hormones epinephrine and
norepinephrine, thereby lowering heart rate and blood pressure,
decreasing the workload on the heart and reducing its oxygen
demand.
Both new trials involved heart attack survivors whose hearts
were still contracting normally, that is, the left ventricle was
pumping out at least 40% of its blood with each beat. Both
trials followed patients for roughly 3.5 years.
Among 5,574 volunteers in the BETAMI-DANBLOCK study from
Norway and Denmark, the drugs showed a clear benefit. Patients
randomly assigned to receive beta-blockers had a 15% lower risk
of death or major adverse cardiovascular event, particularly a
repeat heart attack, compared to patients not taking these
pills, investigators found.
But among the 8,438 participants in the REBOOT trial
conducted in Italy and Spain, beta-blockers had no effect on the
incidence of death from any cause, a repeat heart attack, or
hospitalization for heart failure, according to a separate
report.
Some of the difference may be due to the fact that patients
didn't all receive the same beta-blockers, and the Scandinavian
patients might have been more prone to adverse events because
they were slightly older than patients in Spain and Italy and
more of them had mild heart dysfunction, said Dr. Dan Atar of
the University of Oslo, who led one of the trials.
Among female participants in REBOOT, those taking
beta-blockers - particularly those with good heart function
receiving higher doses - had more adverse outcomes than women
not taking the drugs, researchers reported in the European Heart
Journal.
In REBOOT, researchers did see a lower rate of new heart
attacks, heart failure, or death with beta-blocker use by
patients with mildly reduced heart function, as indicated by a
left ventricular "ejection fraction" between 40% and 49%.
The effect in this subgroup was confirmed in an analysis of
data pooled from REBOOT, BETAMI-DANBLOCK, and a Japanese trial,
according to a report published in The Lancet.
The message for cardiologists, Ibanez said, is "We can now
state with confidence that beta-blockers are beneficial" in
patients with mildly impaired heart function, and "there remains
reasonable uncertainty about their benefit" in patients with
normally functioning hearts.
Atar said an analysis looking specifically at beta-blocker
use by patients with normal heart function will be presented at
a U.S. cardiology meeting in November.