Feb 11 (Reuters) - The parent company of Southern
California Edison has been sued for allegedly defrauding
shareholders before the recent Los Angeles-area wildfires by
assuring them it could shut down power lines to reduce the risk
of catastrophic damage.
Tuesday's proposed class action against Edison International ( EIX )
appeared to be the first shareholder lawsuit stemming
from the Eaton fire, which broke out on January 7 east of Los
Angeles in Altadena, California during a Santa Ana windstorm.
The fire burned more than 14,000 acres, destroyed more than
9,400 structures and killed 17 people.
Edison had no immediate comment, saying it will review the
complaint.
Shareholders led by Felipe Antillon said Edison made
materially false and misleading statements over nearly four
years before the fire, in assuring that its utility unit used a
power shutoff program to "proactively de-energize power lines"
to reduce wildfire risks during "extreme weather events."
The shareholders said the truth began to emerge amid reports
that Edison had not de-energized nearby power lines, while
lawsuits blamed the company's electrical equipment for starting
the Eaton fire, which has since been contained.
Edison's share price has fallen 34% since the fire broke
out.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for shareholders from
February 25, 2021 through February 6, 2025.
On the latter date, Edison said it received information
suggesting a possible link between its equipment and the Eaton
fire, and that it believed its equipment may be associated with
the ignition of the Hurst fire, which burned 799 acres.
Other defendants include Edison's Chief Executive Pedro
Pizarro and Chief Financial Officer Maria Rigatti. Edison is
based in Rosemead, California.
Shareholders often sue companies for alleged misleading
disclosures or omissions after unexpected events cause stock
prices to fall.
The several Los Angeles-area wildfires last month may prove
the most expensive natural disaster in U.S. history.
The case is Antillon v Edison International Inc, U.S.
District Court, Central District of California, No. 25-01154.