LONDON, March 25 (Reuters) - The European Investment
Bank's top-notch ESG score would need to be re-evaluated if it
bows to pressure and starts explicitly funding weapons and
ammunition, one of the world's leading ESG rating firms,
Morningstar Sustainalytics, said.
The European Commission and more than a dozen EU governments
have been increasing pressure on the bloc's lending arm in
recent weeks to end its near-total ban on weapons funding to
help strengthen Europe's defence industry.
New EIB President Nadia Calvino used one of her first public
statements last month to say it was engaging with key
stakeholders on what could been done under a "dual-use" policy
with which it already invests in drones and targeting systems.
Commission hawks though are now urging it to "adapt
defence-related exclusions" to support production of military
equipment, a move some officials, including the EIB's own former
head, worry could tarnish its ESG ratings and impact its
borrowing costs.
If the changes are too far reaching that could happen,
Sustainalytics' Lead ESG Banks Analyst, Amelia Peden, told
Reuters.
"We would have to re-evaluate (the EIBs rating) if they
bring in a new policy," Peden said. "Investing in weapons
definitely exhibits reputational risk, but of course it depends
what kind (of weapons)".
Those seen as the worst such as landmines won't be on the
EIB's list but other forms of ammunition might be after a number
of EU states were found to have limited supplies when asked to
send some to Ukraine.
Sustainalytics currently grades the EIB as having a
"negligible" ESG risk score - with a best-in-class 4.5 that is
one of top scores of any of near 16,000 banks, companies and
other entities it rates.
The bank has a balance sheet that runs to over a half
trillion euros which is bigger that the World Bank's and it
issues up to 65 billion euros ($70 billion) of debt a year.
Peden added that it would be the "exposure" perception part
of the EIB's score that could be most impacted although other
areas could be too.
"There's quite a range of things that (weapons funding)
could have an impact on and therefore their whole kind of
mission. So I think that's something that we will be looking
at."
($1 = 0.9229 euro)
(Reporting by Marc Jones; editing by Costas Pitas)