*
Tobacco companies launched tea sticks to counter EU
flavour ban
*
Within months, some European regulators move to close
loopholes
*
EU government likely to set tougher rules bloc-wide
By Emma Rumney
LONDON, March 28 (Reuters) - European governments are
weighing the introduction of tougher rules on cigarette makers'
new zero-tobacco heat sticks, moving to close the loopholes they
were designed to exploit just months after their launch.
Big tobacco companies including Philip Morris International ( PM )
and British American Tobacco ( BTI ) announced the
launch of the sticks, made from nicotine-infused substances like
rooibos tea, late last year as a way to counter an incoming
European Union ban on flavoured heated tobacco products.
The European Commission said it was currently evaluating EU
tobacco laws and any changes would be subject to the findings of
that effort, public consultation and an impact assessment.
But, already, authorities in Latvia, Lithuania and Croatia
are looking to introduce stronger regulations to govern the
products, officials from the three countries told Reuters.
In Latvia, a draft bill would classify the zero-tobacco
sticks as tobacco substitutes and subject to related controls,
as well as a ban on all flavours except for tobacco from 2025, a
health ministry spokesperson said.
"We plan to regulate them in future," a spokesperson for
Croatia's health ministry agreed, adding they were addictive and
had potential health risks. The person did not respond to
requests for further information.
Regulation of such products is also being discussed
internally in Lithuania, but it was too early to say what was on
the table, a Ministry of Health spokesperson said.
German authorities, meanwhile, are in a dispute with some
manufacturers over whether existing tobacco tax laws cover the
new products, according to a spokesperson for the Federal
Customs Authority.
BAT said it supports the introduction of evidence-based
regulation and appropriate excise taxes for its zero-tobacco
sticks, adding 15 EU member states have already introduced
excise duties.
PMI also believes any nicotine-containing cigarette
alternative should be regulated and taxed appropriately, a
spokesperson said, adding however flavours play an important
role in encouraging adult smokers to switch away from smoking.
REGULATION RISKS
Zero-tobacco sticks make only a tiny contribution to tobacco
companies' revenues, which still overwhelmingly come from
cigarettes.
But they marked a significant strategic development that
companies trumpeted to investors as examples of innovation that
can help them operate within ever-stricter regulations targeting
their other products.
In some markets, the sticks have been growing fast. In
Czechia and Romania, they already accounted for half of all
sticks sold for BAT's heated tobacco device in December, with
the figure at 30% in Germany and 19% in Greece.
BAT, which had launched its product in 11 European markets
as of February, plans to roll the sticks out globally.
PMI's product is available in Czechia. It plans further
market launches this year and is also set to launch more
flavours, according to market intelligence firm NGP Trends,
citing trademark applications by the company.
A spokesperson for Czechia's health ministry said it wasn't
currently preparing any regulation for zero-tobacco sticks.
Romania's health ministry did not respond to requests for
comment.
Countries including Belgium, Slovenia, Switzerland and
Poland are however also working on regulations or taxes for such
products, according to analysts at market and regulatory
research firm ECigIntelligence.
The European Commission meanwhile will likely shut down
loopholes bloc-wide when it next updates EU tobacco laws, said
Malcolm Saxton, senior consultant for chemistry at regulatory
consultancy Broughton, adding it is likely considering controls
on flavours, marketing and more.
To fend off regulations that could limit their products'
appeal, tobacco companies would need to provide evidence the
products play a role in reducing the harms of smoking and change
the perception they exist only to circumvent regulation, he
continued.
BAT says data to date suggests that its product potentially
has lower risk compared to cigarettes, but researchers have
warned that the health effects of such products are unknown.