NEW YORK, July 18 (Reuters) - A former Citigroup
managing director who said she was fired because she refused to
mislead a federal regulator about the bank's risk management
accused Citigroup's ( C/PN ) chief operating officer of intentional
deception, according to an amended lawsuit filed late on
Thursday.
WHAT HAPPENED
Kathleen Martin said Chief Operating Officer Anand Selva
"wanted to misreport Citi's metrics to deceive" the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency into believing the bank was
complying with its $400 million settlement agreement in 2020
addressing risk management shortfalls.
Martin's amended complaint in Manhattan federal court
repeated the claim that Selva was concerned that reporting
accurate information would "make us look bad."
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Martin said a successful misreporting would have also
deceived shareholders and the public, while failure would have
had "enormous legal and financial implications" for the
third-largest U.S. bank, perhaps including "major" new fines.
The amended complaint also added specific illustrations of
compliance shortfalls at Citigroup.
These included the $135.6 million fine that the OCC and
Federal Reserve imposed on July 10 over the bank's "insufficient
progress" in addressing problems identified in 2020.
That fine was the latest blow for Chief Executive Jane
Fraser, who has focused on making Citigroup leaner and made
cleaning up its regulatory failings a top priority.
THE RESPONSE
Citigroup had no immediate comment after market hours.
It has said it fired Martin last September because she
lacked leadership and engagement skills for her job as interim
data transformation chair.
The bank has also said her allegations were untrue, and that
if they were true her whistleblowing was not protected activity
under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley governance law.
WHAT'S NEXT
Citigroup has until Aug. 8 to respond to the amended
complaint. The bank had sought on June 27 to dismiss Martin's
original complaint, but federal law allowed her to amend it
once.
The case is Martin v. Citibank NA et al, U.S. District
Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-03949.