April 7 (Reuters) - Nearly a third of patients with
advanced liver cancer who received a personalized vaccine
developed by Geneos Therapeutics along with an immunotherapy
drug in a small, early trial saw their tumors shrink, U.S.
researchers reported on Sunday.
The result was roughly twice the response typically seen
with the immunotherapy alone, the researchers said.
Findings from the preliminary study, presented at the
American Association for Cancer Research in San Diego and
published in Nature Medicine, suggests that vaccines based on
mutations only present in a patient's tumor may boost the immune
system's ability to recognize and attack hard-to-treat cancers.
The findings, which must be confirmed in a larger trial,
moves the industry another step closer to effective cancer
vaccines, after many past failures, and may expand the types of
cancers that such therapies can treat.
Partners Moderna ( MRNA ) and Merck and Co ( MRK ) and
others have had promising results combining customized vaccines
with immunotherapy to prevent skin cancer from returning in
patients following surgery.
For the study, researchers used samples from patients'
tumors to build vaccines based on neoantigens - new mutations
only present on an individual patient's tumor. The goal was to
train the immune system to attack and kill only these unique
proteins, leaving healthy tissue unscathed.
Unlike skin cancer, which has many mutations for the body to
recognize, liver cancer is considered a cold cancer because it
contains fewer mutations, which has rendered immunotherapies
less effective.
"This vaccine essentially educates the immune system to
recognize antigens that it's ignored," said study leader Dr.
Mark Yarchoan of Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.
The study involved 36 patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma, the most common form of liver cancer. Patients were
given custom-made vaccines on top of Merck's ( MRK ) widely used
immunotherapy Keytruda, the standard of care at the time.
Nearly a third of the patients treated with the combination
therapy (30.1%) experienced tumor shrinkage, with three of those
subjects having a complete response, meaning no detectable signs
of the tumor remaining after a median follow-up of 21.5 months.
That compares with the typical response of about 12% to 18%
in patients with liver cancer who receive immunotherapy alone.
"This certainly suggested that the vaccine actually added
clinical efficacy," Yarchoan said.
The most common adverse effect was mild injection site
reactions. There were no serious adverse events.
Unlike many vaccine candidates based on messenger RNA (mRNA)
technology, the Geneos treatment is a DNA vaccine in which the
genetic code of the mutated proteins is injected into cells
using a small electrical impulse. Each vaccine can target up to
40 mutated genes.
Yarchoan said larger trials are being planned, but declined
to provide details.