HOUSTON, May 28 (Reuters) - Hess Corp ( HES )
shareholders will vote on Tuesday on Chevron's ( CVX ) proposed
$53 billion acquisition of the company, after many investors
have called for a delay in hopes of obtaining a better offer for
their shares.
The vote has huge implications for both companies. The deal
has been stalled in part by a regulatory review and clouded by
an arbitration dispute with Exxon Mobil ( XOM ), which could
push the deal's closing to 2025 or result in its termination.
The deal spread, a Wall Street measure of investor
confidence in the completion of a proposed merger, has climbed
to about $10, double the initial spread, indicating greater risk
perception over the transaction.
Chevron ( CVX ) is counting on approval to win a foothold in
oil-rich Guyana's lucrative offshore fields. A deal failure
would leave Hess as a standalone company with little immediate
prospect of a new bid.
Hess needs a majority of its 308 million outstanding shares
to seal the all-stock deal with its shareholders and make it
more difficult for other potential rivals to outbid Chevron ( CVX ).
While Exxon has expressed no interest in bidding for Hess as
a whole, it has not ruled out a potential bid for Hess' assets
in Guyana, the company's prize asset.
Exxon operates all production in one of the world's
fastest-growing oil producing nations with a 45% stake in the
giant Stabroek Block. CNOOC owns another 25% of the
joint-venture. Both claim a right of first refusal on any Hess
sale of its 30% stake.
The Chevron ( CVX ) acquisition was thrown into doubt after Exxon
and CNOOC filed an arbitration claim against the sale.
Financial firms Vanguard Group and BlackRock ( BLK ), which
hold a combined 15% of Hess' shares, could tip the balance in
the vote, given the push by arbitrage funds to adjourn the
meeting until the arbitration claim is resolved.
Proxy firm Institutional Shareholder Services recommended
shareholders vote to abstain and urged Hess to offer an
incentive to shareholders because of the deal delay.
As of last week, shareholders owning about 40% of the
combined shares were contemplating abstaining from the vote, an
action that effectively equates to voting against it, people
familiar with the matter said. They say that finalizing the deal
now would prevent the potential for better offers for their
shares throughout the year.