JASPER COUNTY, INDIANA, April 27 (Reuters) - Dave
Duttlinger's first thought when he saw a dense band of
yellowish-brown dust smearing the sky above his Indiana farm
was: I warned them this would happen.
About 445 acres of his fields near Wheatfield, Indiana, are
covered in solar panels and related machinery - land that in
April 2019 Duttlinger leased to Dunns Bridge Solar LLC, for one
of the largest solar developments in the Midwest.
On that blustery spring afternoon in 2022, Duttlinger said,
his phone rang with questions from frustrated neighbors: Why is
dust from your farm inside my truck? Inside my house? Who should
I call to clean it up?
According to Duttlinger's solar lease, reviewed by Reuters,
Dunns Bridge said it would use "commercially reasonable efforts
to minimize any damage to and disturbance of growing crops and
crop land caused by its construction activities" outside the
project site and "not remove topsoil" from the property itself.
Still, sub-contractors graded Duttlinger's fields to assist the
building of roads and installation of posts and panels, he said,
despite his warnings that it could make the land more vulnerable
to erosion.
Crews reshaped the landscape, spreading fine sand across
large stretches of rich topsoil, Duttlinger said. When Reuters
visited his farm last year and this spring, much of the land
beneath the panels was covered in yellow-brown sand, where no
plants grew.
"I'll never be able to grow anything on that field again,"
the farmer said. About one-third of his approximately 1,200-acre
farm - where his family grows corn, soybeans and alfalfa for
cattle - has been leased.
The Dunns Bridge Solar project is a subsidiary of NextEra
Energy Resources LLC, the world's largest generator of renewable
energy from wind and solar. Duttlinger said when he approached
NextEra about the damage to his land, the company said it would
review any remedial work needed at the end of its contract in
2073, as per the terms of the agreement.
NextEra declined to comment on the matter or on what future
commitments it made to Duttlinger, and Reuters could not
independently confirm them. Project developer Orion Renewable
Energy Group LLC directed questions to NextEra.
The solar industry is pushing into the U.S. Midwest, drawn
by cheaper land rents, access to electric transmission, and a
wealth of federal and state incentives. The region also has what
solar needs: wide-open fields.
A renewable energy boom risks damaging some of America's
richest soils in key farming states like Indiana, according to a
Reuters analysis of federal, state and local data; hundreds of
pages of court records; and interviews with more than 100 energy
and soil scientists, agricultural economists, farmers and
farmland owners, and local, state and federal lawmakers.
Some of Duttlinger's farm, including parts now covered in
solar panels, is on land classified by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) as the most productive for growing crops,
according to a Reuters analysis.
For landowners like Duttlinger, the promise of profits is
appealing. Solar leases in Indiana and surrounding states can
offer $900 to $1,500 an acre per year in land rents, with annual
rate increases, according to a Reuters review of solar leases
and interviews with four solar project developers. In
comparison, farmland rent in top corn and soybean producers
Indiana, Illinois and Iowa averaged about $251 per acre in 2023,
USDA data shows.
Farmland Partners Inc ( FPI ), a publicly traded farmland real
estate investment trust (REIT) has leased about 9,000 acres
nationwide to solar firms. Much of that ground is highly
productive, said Executive Chairman Paul Pittman.
"Do I think it's the best use of that land? Probably not.
But our investors would kill us if we didn't pursue this," he
said.
Some renewable energy developers said not all leases become
solar projects. Some are designing their sites to make it
possible to grow crops between panels, while others, like Doral
Renewables LLC, said they use livestock to graze around the
panels as part of their land management. Developers also argue
that in the Midwest, where more than one-third of the U.S. corn
crop is used for ethanol production, solar energy is key for
powering future electric vehicles.
Some agricultural economists and agronomists counter that
taking even small amounts of the best cropland out of production
for solar development and damaging valuable topsoil impacts
future crop potential in the United States.
Common solar farm construction practices, including clearing
and grading large sections of land, also can lead to significant
erosion and major runoff of sediment into waterways without
proper remediation, according to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the Justice Department.
Solar development comes amid increasing competition for
land: In 2023, there were 76.2 million - or nearly 8% - fewer
acres in farms than in 1997, USDA data shows, as farmland is
converted for residential, commercial and industrial use.
In response to Reuters' findings, USDA said that urban
sprawl and development are currently bigger contributors to
farmland loss than solar, citing reports from the Department of
Energy and agency-funded research.
BUILDING ON PRIME CROPLAND
No one knows how much cropland nationwide is currently under
solar panels or leased for possible future development. Land
deals are typically private transactions. Scientists at the
United States Geological Survey and the U.S. Department of
Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have been
compiling a database of existing solar facilities across the
country. While that project is incomplete and ongoing, Reuters
found that around 0.02% of all cropland in the continental U.S.
intersected in some way with large-scale, ground-based solar
panel sites they had identified as of 2021.
The total power capacity of the solar operations tracked in
the data set represents over 60 gigawatts of electric power
capacity. In the following two years, solar capacity has nearly
tripled, according to a Dec. 2023 report from the Solar Energy
Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie.
To better understand future land-use patterns, Reuters
analyzed federal government data to identify cropland that USDA
classified as prime, unique, or of local or statewide
importance. Reuters also reviewed more than 2,000 pages of
solar-related documents filed at local county recorders' offices
in a small sample of four Midwestern counties - Pulaski, Starke
and Jasper counties in Indiana, and Columbia County in
Wisconsin.
The counties, representing an area of land slightly bigger
than the state of Delaware, are where some of the nation's
largest projects are being developed or built. The sample is not
necessarily representative of the broader United States but
gives an idea of the potential impact of solar projects in
farm-heavy counties.
Reuters found the percentage of these counties' most
productive cropland secured by solar and energy companies as of
end of 2022 was as follows: 12% in Pulaski, 9% in Starke, 4% in
Jasper and 5% in Columbia.
Jerry Hatfield, former director of USDA Agricultural
Research Service's National Laboratory for Agriculture and the
Environment, said Reuters' findings in the four counties are
"concerning."
"It's not the number of acres converting to solar," he said.
"It's the quality of the land coming out of production, and what
that means for local economies, state economies and the
country's future abilities for crop production."
More than a dozen agronomists, as well as renewable energy
researchers and other experts consulted by Reuters, said the
approach to measuring solar's impact was fair. The news agency
also shared its findings with six solar developers and energy
firms working in these counties. Three said Reuters' sample size
was too small, and the range of findings too wide, to be a fair
portrayal of industry siting and construction practices.
By 2050, to meet the Biden Administration's decarbonization
targets, the U.S. will need up to 1,570 gigawatts of electric
energy capacity from solar.
While the land needed for ground-based solar development to
achieve this goal won't be even by state, it is not expected to
exceed 5% of any state's land area, except the smallest state of
Rhode Island, where it could reach 6.5%, by 2050, according to
the Energy Department's Solar Futures Study, published in 2021.
Researchers at American Farmland Trust, a non-profit
farmland protection organization which champions what it calls
Smart Solar, forecast last year that 83% of new solar energy
development in the U.S. will be on farm and ranchland, unless
current government policies changed. Nearly half would be on the
nation's best land for producing food, fiber, and other crops,
they warned.
FUEL DEBATE
Five renewable developers and solar energy firms interviewed
by Reuters counter that the industry's use of farmland is too
small to impact domestic food production overall and should be
balanced with the need to decarbonize the U.S. energy market in
the face of climate change.
Doral Renewables, the developer behind the $1.5 billion
Mammoth Solar project in Pulaski and Starke counties, does not
consider corn or soybean yields in its siting decisions.
Instead, the company looks at the land's topography, zoning
and closeness to an electrical grid or substation - and tries to
avoid wooded areas, ditches and environmentally sensitive areas,
said Nick Cohen, Doral's president and CEO.
Shifting corn acres for solar? "I don't see it as replacing
something that is vital to our society," Cohen said. Solar can
make farmland "more productive from an economic perspective," he
added.
Indiana farmer Norm Welker says he got a better deal leasing
60% of his farmland to Mammoth than he would have growing corn,
with prices dipping to three-year lows this year.
"We've got mounds of corn, we're below the cost of
production, and right now, if you're renting land to grow corn -
you're losing money," Welker said. "This way, my economic
circumstances are very good."