*
India imposes new software, hardware testing rules for all
CCTVs
*
Firms say they face disruption due to high scrutiny, slow
approvals
*
India worried about Chinese spying via CCTVs, govt
official says
*
Industry warns of impact amid soaring demand for security
cameras
By Aditya Kalra
NEW DELHI, May 28 (Reuters) - Global makers of
surveillance gear have clashed with Indian regulators in recent
weeks over contentious new security rules that require
manufacturers of CCTV cameras to submit hardware, software and
source code for assessment in government labs, official
documents and company emails show.
The security-testing policy has sparked industry warnings of
supply disruptions and added to a string of disputes between
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration and foreign
companies over regulatory issues and what some perceive as
protectionism.
New Delhi's approach is driven in part by its alarm about
China's sophisticated surveillance capabilities, according to a
top Indian official involved in the policymaking. In 2021,
Modi's then-junior IT minister told parliament that 1 million
cameras in government institutions were from Chinese companies
and there were vulnerabilities with video data transferred to
servers abroad.
Under the new requirements applicable from April,
manufacturers such as China's Hikvision, Xiaomi ( XIACF )
and Dahua, South Korea's Hanwha, and
Motorola Solutions ( MSI ) of the U.S. must submit cameras for
testing by Indian government labs before they can sell them in
the world's most populous nation. The policy applies to all
internet-connected CCTV models made or imported since April 9.
"There's always an espionage risk," Gulshan Rai, India's
cybersecurity chief from 2015 to 2019, told Reuters. "Anyone can
operate and control internet-connected CCTV cameras sitting in
an adverse location. They need to be robust and secure."
Indian officials met on April 3 with executives of 17
foreign and domestic makers of surveillance gear, including
Hanwha, Motorola, Bosch, Honeywell ( HON ) and Xiaomi ( XIACF ), where many of the
manufacturers said they weren't ready to meet the certification
rules and lobbied unsuccessfully for a delay, according to the
official minutes.
In rejecting the request, the government said India's policy
"addresses a genuine security issue" and must be enforced, the
minutes show.
India said in December the CCTV rules, which do not single
out any country by name, aimed to "enhance the quality and
cybersecurity of surveillance systems in the country."
This report is based on a Reuters review of dozens of
documents, including records of meetings and emails between
manufacturers and Indian IT ministry officials, and interviews
with six people familiar with India's drive to scrutinize the
technology. The interactions haven't been previously reported.
Insufficient testing capacity, drawn-out factory inspections
and government scrutiny of sensitive source code were among key
issues camera makers said had delayed approvals and risked
disrupting unspecified infrastructure and commercial projects.
"Millions of dollars will be lost from the industry, sending
tremors through the market," Ajay Dubey, Hanwha's director for
South Asia, told India's IT ministry in an email on April 9.
The IT ministry and most of the companies identified by
Reuters didn't respond to requests for comment about the
discussions and the impact of the testing policy. The ministry
told the executives on April 3 that it may consider accrediting
more testing labs.
Millions of CCTV cameras have been installed across Indian
cities, offices and residential complexes in recent years to
enhance security monitoring. New Delhi has more than 250,000
cameras, according to official data, mostly mounted on poles in
key locations.
The rapid take-up is set to bolster India's surveillance
camera market to $7 billion by 2030, from $3.5 billion last
year, Counterpoint Research analyst Varun Gupta told Reuters.
China's Hikvision and Dahua account for 30% of the market,
while India's CP Plus has a 48% share, Gupta said, adding that
some 80% of all CCTV components are from China.
Hanwha, Motorola Solutions ( MSI ) and Britain's Norden
Communication told officials by email in April that just a
fraction of the industry's 6,000 camera models had approvals
under the new rules.
CHINA CONCERN
The U.S. in 2022 banned sales of Hikvision and Dahua equipment,
citing national security risks. Britain and Australia have also
restricted China-made devices.
Likewise, with CCTV cameras, India "has to ensure there are
checks on what is used in these devices, what chips are going
in," the senior Indian official told Reuters. "China is part of
the concern."
China's state security laws require organizations to
cooperate with intelligence work.
Reuters reported this month that unexplained communications
equipment had been found in some Chinese solar power inverters
by U.S. experts who examined the products.
Since 2020, when Indian and Chinese forces clashed at their
border, India has banned dozens of Chinese-owned apps, including
TikTok, on national security grounds. India also tightened
foreign investment rules for countries with which it shares a
land border.
The remote detonation of pagers in Lebanon last year, which
Reuters reported was executed by Israeli operatives targeting
Hezbollah, further galvanized Indian concerns about the
potential abuse of tech devices and the need to quickly enforce
testing of CCTV equipment, the senior Indian official said.
The camera-testing rules don't contain a clause about land
borders.
But last month, China's Xiaomi ( XIACF ) said that when it applied for
testing of CCTV devices, Indian officials told the company the
assessment couldn't proceed because "internal guidelines"
required Xiaomi ( XIACF ) to supply more registration details of two of
its China-based contract manufacturers.
"The testing lab indicated that this requirement applies to
applications originating from countries that share a land border
with India," the company wrote in an April 24 email to the
Indian agency that oversees lab testing.
Xiaomi ( XIACF ) didn't respond to Reuters queries, and the IT
ministry didn't address questions about the company's account.
China's foreign ministry told Reuters it opposes the
"generalization of the concept of national security to smear and
suppress Chinese companies," and hoped India would provide a
non-discriminatory environment for Chinese firms.
LAB TESTING, FACTORY VISITS
While CCTV equipment supplied to India's government has had
to undergo testing since June 2024, the widening of the rules to
all devices has raised the stakes.
The public sector accounts for 27% of CCTV demand in India,
and enterprise clients, industry, hospitality firms and homes
the remaining 73%, according to Counterpoint.
The rules require CCTV cameras to have tamper-proof
enclosures, strong malware detection and encryption.
Companies need to run software tools to test source code and
provide reports to government labs, two camera industry
executives said.
The rules allow labs to ask for source code if companies are
using proprietary communication protocols in devices, rather
than standard ones like Wi-Fi. They also enable Indian officials
to visit device makers abroad and inspect facilities for cyber
vulnerabilities.
The Indian unit of China's Infinova told IT
ministry officials last month the requirements were creating
challenges.
"Expectations such as source code sharing, retesting post
firmware upgrades, and multiple factory audits significantly
impact internal timelines," Infinova sales executive Sumeet
Chanana said in an email on April 10. Infinova didn't respond to
Reuters questions.
The same day, Sanjeev Gulati, India director for
Taiwan-based Vivotek, warned Indian officials that
"All ongoing projects will go on halt." He told Reuters this
month that Vivotek had submitted product applications and hoped
"to get clearance soon."
The body that examines surveillance gear is India's
Standardization Testing and Quality Certification Directorate,
which comes under the IT ministry. The agency has 15 labs that
can review 28 applications concurrently, according to data on
its website that was removed after Reuters sent questions. Each
application can include up to 10 models.
As of May 28, 342 applications for hundreds of models from
various manufacturers were pending, official data showed. Of
those, 237 were classified as new, with 142 lodged since the
April 9 deadline.
Testing had been completed on 35 of those applications,
including just one from a foreign company.
India's CP Plus told Reuters it had received clearance for
its flagship cameras but several more models were awaiting
certification.
Bosch said it too had submitted devices for testing, but
asked that Indian authorities "allow business continuity" for
those products until the process is completed.
When Reuters visited New Delhi's bustling Nehru Place
electronics market last week, shelves were stacked with popular
CCTV cameras from Hikvision, Dahua and CP Plus.
But Sagar Sharma said revenue at his CCTV retail shop had
plunged about 50% this month from April because of the slow pace
of government approvals for security cameras.
"It is not possible right now to cater to big orders," he
said. "We have to survive with the stock we have."