Nov 14 (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase ( JPM ) has secured
deals that will ensure it receives payments from fintech
companies for access to its customer bank account data by
third-party apps, CNBC reported on Friday, citing sources
familiar with the matter.
The agreements were struck with data aggregators including
Plaid, Yodlee, Morningstar and Akoya, Drew Pusateri, a JPMorgan
Chase ( JPM ) spokesperson, told Reuters.
Data aggregators are intermediaries who link banks with
fintech firms. They previously accessed customer account data
from banks such as JPMorgan ( JPM ) without paying for it, enabling
fintech apps to offer services like budgeting and payments - an
arrangement that drew criticism from lenders concerned about
data security and fair compensation.
"The free market worked. After productive conversations with
our aggregator and fintech partners, we've come to agreements
that will make the open banking ecosystem safer and more
sustainable - and allow customers to continue reliably and
securely accessing their favorite financial products," Pusateri
added.
The deals follow weeks of talks between the largest U.S.
bank and the aggregators, with JPMorgan ( JPM ) agreeing to a lower fee
than initially proposed and fintech intermediaries securing
concessions on how data requests are handled, the CNBC report
added.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) "open
banking" rule, introduced last year under the Biden
administration, set standards for data sharing between fintechs
and banks, enabling consumers to move personal financial data
between providers at no cost.
Banks, facing potential losses, swiftly criticized the rule,
arguing it risked consumer data security and overstepped the
agency's authority, while fintech firms welcomed it, saying it
would enable secure sharing of consumer data.
The CFPB kicked off a do-over of its "open banking"
regulations in August, amid public pressure from fintech firms
and crypto entrepreneurs.
The Trump administration had initially sided with a banking
industry call to scrap the regulations entirely, claiming they
exceeded the agency's legal powers, before changing tack earlier
in the year, citing "recent events in the marketplace."