*
Judge extends block on Musk's DOGE accessing Treasury
systems
*
Democratic attorneys general challenge Musk's legal
authority
*
Some 70 lawsuits have been filed challenging Trump
initiatives
*
Most Trump initiatives that have been legally challenged
have
been blocked by courts
*
Trump administration defends DOGE's oversight role in
government
systems
(Updates throughout with details from four court hearings)
By Luc Cohen and Tom Hals
NEW YORK, Feb 14 (Reuters) - A federal judge extended a
block on Elon Musk's government cost-cutting team known as DOGE
from accessing payment systems at the U.S. Treasury Department
on Friday, as Democratic state officials and unions turned to
the courts to slow the billionaire's efforts.
The Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency has swept
through federal agencies since Republican Donald Trump became
president last month and put the chief executive of carmaker
Tesla in charge of rooting out wasteful spending as
part of Trump's dramatic overhaul of government, which included
thousands of job cuts on Friday.
In Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas extended
a temporary block on DOGE that was put in place on Saturday,
which prevented Musk's team from accessing Treasury systems
responsible for trillions of dollars of payments.
The judge said at a court hearing that she would not yet
rule on a request from 19 Democratic state attorneys general for
a longer-lasting preliminary injunction on DOGE's access to the
systems.
The case by the attorneys general is one of at least 20
related to efforts to slash the size of the government. Around
70 lawsuits have been filed challenging Trump initiatives, from
ending birthright citizenship to limiting federal funding for
transgender health treatments, and many policies have been
blocked by courts.
The attorneys general alleged that Musk's team has no legal
power to access the payment systems that contain sensitive
personal information on millions of Americans and that Musk and
his team could disrupt funding for health clinics, preschools
and other programs.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for
comment. Musk and other Trump allies have called for judges to
be impeached in response to rulings against his DOGE team,
although the president said he would obey court orders.
At three other court hearings on Friday, judges declined to
rule immediately on requests to block or extend orders barring
the DOGE team access to government systems.
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss considered a request by
the University of California Student Association to extend a
temporary block on DOGE from accessing systems at the Department
of Education, which the students said would violate privacy and
administrative procedure laws.
The judge, an appointee of Democratic former President
Barack Obama, said he would issue a decision by Monday.
The Trump administration has said that access is crucial to
allow DOGE to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in student loan
programs at a department that the president and Musk say should
be eliminated.
"What does that mean, fraud, waste and abuse?" Moss asked a
Justice Department attorney at the hearing. "I expect if you ask
Elon Musk, he would say the entire Department of Education is
waste."
U.S. District Judge John Bates in Washington heard arguments
by unions to prevent the DOGE team from accessing sensitive
records at the Department of Health and Human Services, the
Labor Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
He described the government's position as "odd" that DOGE
was not a government agency when it came to an open records law
but it was under a statute that allowed its staff to work at
various government departments.
Bates did not say when he would rule.
A group of Democratic attorneys general sued Musk, Trump and
DOGE on Thursday, alleging that Musk's appointment was
unconstitutional and asked a federal judge to bar him from
accessing and using government data, cancelling contracts or
making personnel decisions.
At a hearing in that case on Friday, U.S. District Judge
Tanya Chutkan in Washington was skeptical of the states'
request and Chutkan did not say when she would rule.
Most of Trump's initiatives that have been legally
challenged have been blocked by the courts. Most of the
cost-cutting campaign appears to be focused on programs opposed
by political conservatives.