NEW YORK, Sept 29 (Reuters) - Liquefied natural gas
(LNG) will be European oil major Shell's biggest contribution to
the energy industry over the next decade in terms of value and
as it seeks to cut emissions from fossil fuel production, CEO
Wael Sawan said on Monday.
Sawan has increased Shell's focus on natural gas to improve
the company's financial performance against its peers in Europe
and the U.S. since taking over as CEO in January 2023, pivoting
away from renewables by pulling out of a number of wind, solar
and other low-carbon ventures.
Sawan said he believes LNG is one of the most effective
fuels in the effort to lower global emissions as it can replace
coal in places like India, China and other Asian countries. He
expects demand for the superchilled fuel to grow 60% between now
and 2040, with LNG making up about 20% of global natural gas
sales by then, up from around 13% at present.
"We are absolutely committed to this sector," Sawan said at
an Economic Club of New York event, noting that the company has
a number of LNG projects planned in Abu Dhabi, Nigeria and
elsewhere.
Sawan, who last week visited Vancouver to celebrate the
company's LNG Canada facility, said the company is still
weighing a few factors before making a final investment decision
on a second phase of the project.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney included the expansion
on a list of five major nation-building projects that he wanted
to see expedited. The plant is the first major LNG export
facility in Canada and the first on the west coast of North
America.
"I don't think I've ever seen the stars as well aligned as I
see now in Canada," Sawan said, noting strong government support
at both the provincial and national level. "Everyone is really
keen on that project materializing."
Still, a decision will depend on Shell's analysis of market
conditions, especially as a massive wave of LNG capacity
additions in the U.S. and elsewhere is expected to hit the
market over the coming years.
"The number of final investment decisions being taken
surprises me, if I'm honest, because it's at the higher end of
the cost curve," he said. "So it's not economically fully
rational."
"Therefore, we need to be able to then judge when is the
right time to bring more capacity," he added.
(Reporting by Shariq Khan in New York; editing by Thomas
Derpinghaus.)