*
Oil companies cautious on Alaska as policy reversals
possible
*
US oil production already at record levels
*
Industry seeks long-term certainty beyond executive orders
By Sheila Dang and Valerie Volcovici
HOUSTON/WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) -
U.S. oil and gas companies are unlikely to expand
development in Alaska and the Arctic following President Donald
Trump's executive order enabling them to do so, company
officials and industry representatives told Reuters, noting a
future president could easily reverse Trump's move.
U.S. oil production is already at record levels due
largely to increased production in more accessible areas like
Texas and New Mexico, and companies have limited spending on new
projects to focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Analysts said drillers may not be in a hurry to take
advantage of Trump's order on Monday titled "Unleashing Alaska's
extraordinary resource potential."
The executive order would reopen vast areas for drilling and
mining, and expedite permits for projects, part of Trump's
sweeping plan to maximize oil and gas production while reversing
former President Joe Biden's policies encouraging the transition
to renewable energy sources to fight climate change.
"Many of these areas have been closed for a good long
while," said Dustin Meyers, senior vice president of policy at
the American Petroleum Institute, a trade organization that
represents major oil firms including Exxon Mobil ( XOM ), Chevron Corp ( CVX ),
and ConocoPhillips ( COP ).
"There is always the risk that these areas could be reclosed
after the next election cycle," he said, adding that is the key
issue that could temper interest from oil companies in the short
term to pursue new drilling projects there.
Drilling in the Arctic and Alaska is a high-risk endeavor,
involving decades of work and billions of dollars of investment.
Exxon, Chevron ( CVX ), Conoco, and
Occidental Petroleum ( OXY ) did not comment.
Conoco is among the most active oil companies in Alaska's
Arctic, and secured a federal approval from the Biden
administration for its $8 billion Willow project there in 2023,
angering environmental groups.
The U.S. drilling industry trade group AXPC also did not
comment.
A source at one major U.S. oil company, who asked not to be
named discussing the matter, said many companies are unlikely to
pursue projects in Alaska based on Trump's executive order
alone, seeking long-term certainty like an act of Congress.
Energy consultancy Rystad said Trump's use of the "drill,
baby, drill" mantra in his inauguration speech overestimates the
industry's willingness to prioritize growth over generating
shareholder returns.
Drilling in Alaska's pristine Arctic refuge has long been a
source of friction between Alaska lawmakers and tribal
corporations seeking to open more acres to drilling to spur
economic growth, and Democratic presidential administrations
that sought to preserve the local ecosystem and wildlife.
A 2017 tax law during Trump's first term mandated oil and
gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a 19
million-acre sanctuary for species including polar bears and
Porcupine caribou. But interest has been sparse.
The Biden Interior Department received no bids from energy
companies last year when it offered 400,000 acres of the refuge,
the minimum amount required.
ANWR's wild landscape lacks roads and public facilities, but
its 1.6 million-acre coastal area along the Beaufort Sea is
estimated to have up to 11.8 billion barrels of recoverable oil,
enough to supply the U.S. for more than a year and a half at
current rates.
Before leaving office this month, Biden banned new offshore
oil and gas drilling in federal waters off the East and West
coasts, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and portions of the northern
Bering Sea in Alaska. The move was considered mostly symbolic
since it mainly covered zones that have no important prospects.
Trump issued an order seeking to repeal those protections.
Still, the energy industry is "cautiously optimistic" that
the Trump administration will continue easing regulations that
have hampered oil and gas development, said API's Meyers.
"The administration deserves a lot of credit for at least
doing everything that they can do to send the signal that these
areas are going to be open for development," he said.