(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters)
By Ron Bousso
LONDON, March 17 (Reuters) - Iran's threat to send oil
prices to $200 a barrel may sound like bombast, but as the
energy crisis drags on, that outcome looks more likely than U.S.
President Donald Trump's prediction that prices will soon fall
back to pre-war levels.
Now in its third week, the joint Israeli-U.S. war against Iran -
which has escalated into a regional conflict - has elicited a
surprisingly muted reaction from global oil benchmarks.
Brent crude now trades near $100 a barrel, about 65%
above its level at the start of the year, a price that was
unthinkable only weeks ago but still below the brief peak of
nearly $120 last Monday.
And given that roughly a fifth of global oil supplies, or about
20 million barrels per day, have been trapped by the effective
closure of the Strait of Hormuz since the conflict began, crude
prices should arguably be a lot higher.
Brent fell slightly on Monday on news that several tankers
carrying crude and oil products to India, China and Pakistan
have crossed the strait in recent days, as this indicated that
some countries maymanage to negotiate safe passage for their
vessels. But the volumes being moved are extremely modest.
Investors still appear ready to give Trump the benefit of the
doubt, betting that the crisis will unwind quickly and Hormuz
will soon be reopened. Call it the "Trump put," the "TACO trade"
or "buying the Trump," but many oil traders seem to be wagering
that the president will ultimately be able to limit the market
damage.
"When this is over oil prices are going to go down very,
very rapidly," Trump told reporters on Monday.
However, that optimism looks increasingly hard to square with
realities on the ground - both on the battlefield, where
fighting is intensifying, and in physical oil markets, where
supply snarls are metastasizing.
RED ALERT
Physical crude markets are flashing stress signals that
paper markets have so far largely ignored. Omani crude -
exported from a terminal outside the Strait of Hormuz - is
trading at a record premium of $51 a barrel to Brent, compared
with an average of just 75 cents in February, pushing the
outright price to around $150 a barrel for May loading.
A similar pattern is playing out elsewhere. Cash premiums for
Dubai crude jumped to $56 a barrel on Monday from an average of
90 cents in February, according to data from S&P Global Platts
and Reuters.
The surge reflects the enormous uncertainty over the actual
amount of supply available amid repeated Iranian strikes on oil
terminals in Oman and at Fujairah, the United Arab Emirates'
main oil-exporting terminal outside Hormuz.
For refiners, particularly in Asia, this is a serious
problem. The region relies on the Middle East for roughly 60% of
its crude imports, and the difficulty of sourcing alternative,
timely supplies is rapidly becoming acute.
A shipment from the Gulf takes around a month to reach Asian
customers, meaning that with every day Hormuz remains closed,
the supply gap facing refiners widens.
The strain is already forcing painful adjustments. Refiners
across Asia have begun cutting processing rates to conserve
dwindling stocks. China's Sinopec, the world's
largest refiner by capacity, plans to slash production
throughput this month by more than 10% from its original plan
due to a crude supply shortfall, Reuters reported.
At the same time, China and Thailand have banned exports of
refined fuels, a defensive move that risks tightening global
markets further.
As crude scarcity deepens, refined fuel prices are soaring.
Asian jet fuel prices are approaching $200 a barrel, close to a
record of about $220 reached earlier this month.
And this crisis is not confined to Asia.
Europe accounted for roughly three-quarters of Middle Eastern
jet fuel exports shipped via Hormuz last year - about 379,000
bpd, according to data analytics firm Kpler - yet no cargo has
transited the strait since the war began.
Unsurprisingly, jet fuel barges in the
Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp refining hub have surged to a record
$190 a barrel, surpassing the previous peak hit in the immediate
aftermath of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February
2022.
THREE TIMES WORSE
The comparison with the Ukraine crisis is telling.
Russia supplied around 30% of Europe's crude imports and a third
of its refined product imports before the invasion of Ukrainein
2022.
The fear of losing supply from one of the world's largest
producers - Russia pumps around 10 million bpd - drove Brent to
$130 a barrel in the aftermath of the invasion even though this
worst-case scenario never fully materialized.
The physical disruption from the Iran war has already
exceeded that feared amount by more than three times, according
to Morgan Stanley.
To be sure, the oil market entered the Iran war in relatively
comfortable shape, with the International Energy Agency
forecasting that global supply would exceed demand by around 3.7
million bpd. Of course, that glut has been eliminated by the
current disruption.
The IEA's announcement last week of plans for a record release
of 400 million barrels from member states' strategic petroleum
reserves has helped cushion the initial blow. But drawing down
inventories cannot substitute for the delivery of new barrels.
Even the immediate reopening of Hormuz would not bring instant
relief. Around 10 million bpd of Middle Eastern production have
been shut in since the conflict began, according to the IEA.
Restoring those flows would take weeks, if not months.
The supply shock, in other words, is real and could have
legs.
Once Hormuz is finally reopened, oil prices could initially
plunge in a relief rally, but given the grim reality in the
physical markets, traders may want to think twice before betting
that the return to normality Trump has promised is coming
anytime soon.
(The opinions expressed here are those of Ron Bousso, a
columnist for Reuters.)
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),
your essential new source for global financial commentary.
Follow ROI on LinkedIn, and X.
And listen to the Morning Bid daily podcast on Apple, Spotify,
or the Reuters app. Subscribe to hear Reuters journalists
discuss the biggest news in markets and finance seven days a
week.
(Ron Bousso; Editing by Marguerita Choy)