*
Shareholders said rule limited ESG proposals
*
Judge says SEC considered benefits, wasn't arbitrary
*
Plaintiffs pledge to keep engaging with companies
By Jonathan Stempel
June 5 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday dismissed
a lawsuit challenging U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
rule changes that made it harder for shareholders to file
proposals at companies' annual meetings, including for reforms
on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.
U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington, D.C.
rejected arguments that the SEC arbitrarily and capriciously
adopted the changes, including on the alleged pretext it
supported corporate opposition to reforms on contentious issues
such as climate change and workplace diversity.
The SEC was required to determine whether the changes would
"promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation, and it
did so," Walton wrote in a 64-page decision.
Adopted in November 2020, late in Republican President
Donald Trump's first White House term, the SEC rule changes
increased how much stock shareholders had to own, and how long
they had to own it, before submitting proposals.
The changes also added requirements for resubmitting
proposals that shareholders had rejected in the last three
years.
Plaintiffs in the June 2021 lawsuit included the Interfaith
Center on Corporate Responsibility, which represents more than
300 faith-based institutional investors, shareholder advocacy
group As You Sow and shareholder advocate James McRitchie.
They said the SEC, before adopting the rule changes, failed
to quantify the benefits of ESG and other shareholder proposals,
or address the expected loss of "billions of dollars in
long-term shareholder value" by adding restrictions.
In a joint statement following Walton's decision, the
plaintiffs said the changes "only serve to hurt shareholders and
companies alike. Despite this decision, shareholders will
continue to engage with corporations on their environmental and
social impacts."
The SEC declined to comment.
In seeking the lawsuit's dismissal, the SEC said the rule
changes would help ensure that proposals reflect the interests
of all shareholders, and that resubmitted proposals could
receive levels of support "likely to lead to company action."
SEC commissioners voted 3-2 along party lines for the
changes, with Republican appointees in the majority.
The regulator defended the changes during Democratic
President Joe Biden's administration. The U.S. Chamber of
Commerce supported the SEC's position.
The case is Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility et
al v SEC, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No.
21-01620.