*
Mission scrubbed for technical reason
*
An 8-day stay for astronauts has turned into nine months
in
space
*
Astronauts had been expected to leave space station on
Sunday
(Releads with mission scrubbed)
By Joey Roulette
March 12 (Reuters) -
SpaceX on Wednesday scrubbed the expected launch of a
replacement crew of four astronauts to the International Space
Station that would have set in motion the long-awaited
homecoming of U.S. astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams,
who have been stuck in space for nine months after a trip on
Boeing's ( BA ) faulty Starliner.
SpaceX called off the flight over a last-minute technical
issue with the rocket's launchpad, officials said on a
livestream of the launch countdown.
It was not immediately clear when the next launch
opportunity would be. The reason for the scrub suggests that
SpaceX and NASA could try to launch again in the coming days.
NASA had been set to launch a SpaceX rocket from Florida
carrying a replacement crew for the International Space Station
in a mission that would set up the return to Earth of Wilmore
and Williams - stuck in space for nine months after a trip on
Boeing's ( BA ) faulty Starliner.
The U.S. space agency had moved up the mission by two weeks
after President Donald Trump and his adviser Elon Musk, CEO of
SpaceX, called for Wilmore and Williams to be brought back
earlier than NASA had planned.
A planned eight-day stay on the orbiting station has dragged
on for Wilmore and Williams, a pair of veteran astronauts and
U.S. Navy test pilots. Starliner returned to Earth without them
last year.
SpaceX's rocket had been scheduled to blast off from the
Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral at 7:48 p.m. ET (2348
GMT) with a crew of two U.S. astronauts and one astronaut each
from Japan and Russia.
Wilmore and Williams have been working on research and
maintenance with the space station's other astronauts and have
remained safe, according to NASA. Williams told reporters in a
March 4 call that she is looking forward to seeing her family
and pet dogs upon returning home.
"It's been a roller coaster for them, probably a little bit
more so than for us," Williams said of her family. "We're here,
we have a mission - we're just doing what we do every day, and
every day is interesting because we're up in space and it's a
lot of fun."
The flight, known as Crew-10, normally would be considered a
routine astronaut rotation. Instead, it has become entangled in
politics as Trump and Musk have sought - without offering
evidence - to blame former President Joe Biden for the delayed
return of Wilmore and Williams.
The demands by Trump and Musk for an earlier return were an
unusual intervention in NASA's human spaceflight operations. The
mission previously had a target date of March 26, but NASA
swapped a delayed SpaceX capsule with a different one that would
be ready sooner.
When the new crew arrives aboard the station, Wilmore and
Williams and two others - NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russian
cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov - can return to Earth in a capsule
that has been attached to the station since September, as part
of the prior Crew-9 mission.
Wilmore and Williams cannot leave until the new Crew-10
craft arrives in order to keep the ISS staffed with enough U.S.
astronauts for maintenance, according to NASA.
Wilmore and Williams flew to the station in June as the
first test crew of Boeing's ( BA ) Starliner, which suffered propulsion
system issues in space. NASA deemed it too risky for the
astronauts to fly home on the Boeing ( BA ) craft. This led to the
current plan to bring them home in a SpaceX capsule.
Boeing ( BA ) built Starliner under a $4.5 billion contract with
NASA to compete with SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule, which since
2020 has been the U.S. space agency's only vehicle for sending
ISS crew members to orbit from American soil. Last year's
mission had marked Starliner's first test flight with astronauts
aboard, a requirement before NASA could certify the capsule for
routine astronaut missions.
Starliner's development has been plagued with engineering
issues and cost overruns since 2019, putting it far behind
SpaceX's Crew Dragon, which was developed under a similar NASA
contract worth at least $4 billion.