BOSTON, March 28 (Reuters) - State Street is
spelling out criteria its portfolio companies must use to
explain their directors' service on multiple boards, the asset
manager's top stewardship executive said in an interview.
Director service on too many boards, known as "overboarding"
has drawn scrutiny from many investors and helped drive down the
share of board members of Russell 3000 index companies
who serve on more than one board to 17.2% at the end of 2023
from 19% in 2018, according to researcher Equilar.
With $4.1 trillion under management as of Dec. 31, State
Street is an influential investor whose proxy votes shape the
corporate governance policies of many large companies.
Among S&P 500 companies whose shares it holds, State
Street now expects company boards to specify how they evaluate
their directors' time commitments and their limits for how many
different boards directors may serve on.
Companies that do not comply risk votes against the
chair of their nominating committee, State Street said.
The expectation is part of a new proxy voting approach the
Boston-based asset manager announced last year, when it said it
would stop using numeric limits on the number of boards where
directors serve.
Ben Colton, State Street's global head of asset stewardship,
said the new details were meant to help boards to make their own
judgments.
"We're basically trusting the nominations and governance
committees," Colton said in an interview on Wednesday.
Colton said State Street's other governance guidelines were
largely unchanged. Among top index fund managers, State Street
has continued to vote for the highest share of shareholder
resolutions related to environmental, social and governance
(ESG) concerns, according to a recent report by Morningstar.
Like executives at other companies, Colton said State
Street's overall support for ESG resolutions has declined as
they have become more prescriptive and as companies disclose
more details.
Sign up here for the Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter.