March 23 (Reuters) - A Taco Bell and Dunkin franchisee
has agreed to pay more than $1.5 million to settle claims by New
York City that its managers at two dozen restaurants violated a
local law requiring fast food businesses to give workers advance
notice of their schedules and other protections, Mayor Zohran
Mamdani's office said on Monday.
Mamdani, who took office in January, campaigned in part on
strengthening enforcement of worker protection laws.
Salz Management LLC, according to the city's Department of
Consumer and Worker Protection, routinely failed to give workers
sufficient notice of their schedules, pay extra wages for
"clopening" shifts that require workers to close a store one
night and open it the next morning, and offer available shifts
to existing workers before hiring new ones, among other claims.
The city also announced on Monday it is filing suit against
another Dunkin franchisee, QSR Management LLC and its managing
corporate officer Ronny Nader, on allegations that the business
violated New York City scheduling laws for roughly 1,000 workers
at 21 Dunkin stores in Staten Island. The same franchisee was
required by the city in 2022 to pay relief to more than 100
workers.
Neither franchisee responded to a request for comment by
publication time.
In December, New York City announced that Starbucks ( SBUX ) would pay
$38.9 million to settle claims it violated the city's scheduling
law. The office of then-mayor Eric Adams said it was the largest
settlement involving worker protection in the city's history.
On the day the Starbucks ( SBUX ) settlement was announced, Mamdani
praised the agreement at a press conference he held alongside
Senator Bernie Sanders at a picket of striking Starbucks ( SBUX )
workers.
Yum Brands ( YUM ) and Inspire Brands, parent companies for Taco
Bell and Dunkin respectively, did not respond to a request for
comment.
New York City was one of the first in the U.S. to limit
"on-call scheduling," a practice in which retail, fast food and
other service businesses call workers in or cancel shifts with
little notice. Oregon has adopted a similar law, along with Los
Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco and several other U.S. cities.
In 2025, the city opened 57 investigations against fast food
employers for possible violations of the scheduling law,
according to public metrics.
Business groups have criticized the laws, saying they are
unworkable and can lead businesses to cut jobs.