June 6 (Reuters) - Tesla is trying to prevent the city
of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records to Reuters
involving the EV maker's planned launch of self-driving
robotaxis in the city this month.
The news agency in February requested communications between
Tesla and Austin officials over the previous two years. The
request followed CEO Elon Musk's announcement in January that
Tesla would launch fare-collecting robotaxis on Austin public
streets.
Austin public-information officer Dan Davis told Reuters on
April 1 that "third parties" had asked the city to withhold the
records to protect their "privacy or property interests." Austin
officials on April 7 requested an opinion on the news agency's
request from the Texas Attorney General's office, which handles
public-records disputes.
On April 16, an attorney for Tesla wrote the AG
objecting to the release of "confidential, proprietary,
competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret
information" contained in emails between Tesla and Austin
officials. The Tesla attorney wrote that providing the documents
to Reuters would reveal "Tesla's deployment procedure, process,
status and strategy" and "irreparably harm Tesla."
Tesla and the Texas Attorney General's office did not
respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
Neal Falgoust, who oversees public records issues for
Austin's Law Department, said the city "takes no position on the
confidential nature of the information at issue" but is required
to seek the Attorney General's opinion when "a third-party
asserts that their information is proprietary and should not be
released."
Musk has staked Tesla's future on self-driving vehicles he has
promised for a decade but hasn't delivered, making Austin's
robotaxi launch closely watched as a potential milestone. Some
analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock
market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has
yet to deliver.
Little is known about Tesla's plans in Austin. The company
has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20
driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of Austin,
which it has not publicly identified.
In an April 23 response to Tesla's letter, a Reuters lawyer
wrote that Tesla's intent to deploy the unproven technology on
Texas roadways makes its plans "an issue of enormous importance
to Texas and the public at large" and underscored the public's
right to know.
Falgoust, the Austin law department official, did not
respond to questions about whether the public was entitled to
information about Tesla's driverless technology.
Texas state law requires the Attorney General's office to
decide within 45 business days, which would be next week.