Oct 3 (Reuters) - The Texas attorney general has sued
leading insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers
(PBMs), accusing them of collaborating to inflate the cost of
insulin.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office said on Thursday
it had sued insulin makers Eli Lilly ( LLY ), Novo Nordisk
and Sanofi.
The office had also sued PBMs, including CVS'
Caremark, Cigna's ( CI ) Express Scripts, and UnitedHealth's ( UNH )
OptumRx, who act as intermediaries in negotiating drug
prices and coverage.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
The lawsuit targets both insulin manufacturers and PBMs. The
previous action by U.S. antitrust regulators only targeted PBMs.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in September, sued the
same PBMs, accusing them of steering diabetes patients towards
higher-priced insulin in order to secure millions of dollars in
rebates from pharmaceutical companies.
At that time, the FTC had not sued the insulin
manufacturers, but had criticized their role in what it called a
broken system.
CONTEXT
In the Texas lawsuit, Paxton accused that manufacturers
artificially raised the prices of insulin and then paid a
significant, undisclosed portion back to the PBMs for
preferential treatment in return.
The PBMs subsequently awarded preferred status to the
manufacturer with the highest list prices, while excluding
lower-priced drugs, the press release from the attorney
general's office said.
KEY QUOTE
"Big Pharma insulin manufacturers and PBMs worked together
to take advantage of diabetes patients and drive prices as high
as they could," said Paxton.
"Allegations that we play any role in determining the
prices charged by manufacturers for their products are false,
and we intend to vigorously defend against this baseless suit,"
said CVS in an emailed statement.
"Novo Nordisk believes that the allegations in the lawsuit
are meritless, and we intend to vigorously defend against these
claims," a company spokesperson told Reuters.
The other companies did not immediately respond to a request
for comment.