*
Tariffs force manufacturers to choose between tariffs or
higher
U.S. production costs
*
Retailers resist pricing increases, squeezing small and
midsize
manufacturers
*
Companies explore alternative manufacturing locations amid
tariffs
By Siddharth Cavale
NEW YORK, July 2 (Reuters) - When Plufl co-founders Yuki
Kinoshita and Noah Silverman pitched their "dog beds for humans"
prototype to Shark Tank in 2022, they envisioned making the
plush, snuggly, memory foam beds in China and selling them at
retail in the U.S. for $299.
Mark Cuban and Lori Greiner invested $200,000 jointly for
20% of the company, which went on to make over $1 million in
sales in 2023, selling beds on Amazon and their own website.
After U.S. President Donald Trump slapped a 145% tariff on
items imported from China in April, Kinoshita and Silverman
sprung into action, investigating if retailers would be
interested in selling a U.S. made version of their human dog
beds.
The retail price might go higher, but they thought a
"made-in-the-USA" label might be an attractive selling point and
help ease some U.S. retailers' concerns about the impact of
China tariffs.
Silverman and Kinoshita had previously toured a factory in
Las Vegas that could make the memory foam beds for $150 per unit
compared to the $100 overall cost to make the beds in China. But
that $150 manufacturing cost didn't include the faux fur lining
for the cover, which would still need to be imported from
China-adding another $100 per unit.
They pitched a sub-$500 made-in-the-USA version to Costco
, which it turned down, saying it couldn't stock the
product this year and might revisit the idea next year. Costco
did not respond to a request for comment.
The duo behind Plufl are among tens of thousands of American
small and midsize manufacturers facing the choice between paying
steep tariffs on Chinese imports or taking on significantly
higher domestic production costs. Even those willing to pay more
to make goods in the U.S. are confronting another reality:
retailers set prices for consumers and have been largely
unwilling to budge in the face of tariffs.
On June 11, when Trump announced a deal to lower tariffs on
Chinese goods to 55%, Kinoshita and Silverman decided to stay
the course manufacturing their human dog beds in China and
maintain the $299 retail price.
"We're absorbing costs in a number of ways, such as finding
shipping efficiencies by shrinking the box down more and also
taking some hit on our margin," Kinoshita said.
White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the Trump
administration remains committed to reviving U.S. manufacturing,
citing provisions in the Big, Beautiful Bill, which passed on
Tuesday with a slim majority in the Senate, such as allowing
businesses to fully expense equipment investments.
"These complementary policies will turbocharge growth and
drive investment throughout the supply chain," he said in an
emailed statement.
DRINKING MARGINS
Similarly, Aisha Chottani, another "Shark Tank" veteran,
found that tariffs threaten her ability to sell her products in
grocery stores.
Chottani, CEO-founder of Moment, makes her healthy,
stress-reducing carbonated beverages in Wisconsin, but her
packager, CanWorks imports pre-formed aluminum from China, and
is thus subject to aluminum tariffs which raised the price of
cans from by 20%.
When Chottani tried to pass on the 4 cents in additional
costs to Albertsons ( ACI ), which carries her $3.99 "Strawberry Rose"
beverage at about 30 locations in Texas and New Mexico, her
answer was swift. "Albertsons ( ACI ) refused any price increases," she
said and suggested she either keep the same price or leave.
Albertsons ( ACI ) did not respond to a request for comment.
In February, she launched Moment beverages in Sprout Farmers
Markets across the U.S., but was forced to do so with
higher-priced cans. "There wasn't enough time to shift
production to factories in Vietnam or other places," she said.
For now, Chottani is keeping her wholesale price the same
even as her costs have gone up. She's raising additional cash
from investors and looking to cut costs. "Even in the short term
a 20% price hike is huge and is going to wipe out all your
cash," she said.
BABY TARIFFS
It's not just startups that are struggling. Bugaboo, the
Netherlands-based maker of expensive baby gear, owns its own
factory in China and would seem to be well-prepared to weather
tariffs.
The company's popular "Fox 5" stroller, which retails for
about $1,500 in the U.S., is made at its factory in Xiamen,
China, where 97% of strollers and car seats imported to the U.S.
are made, according to ImportGenius, which tracks U.S. import,
export records and shipping manifests.
But when Trump's tariffs hit, Bugaboo started to reevaluate
that strategy. The company had begun studying moving production
to other countries in Asia to have more regional production
flexibility as well as the U.S., but any move would be years
away.
It took Bugaboo a number of years to establish its Xiamen
operations. If it had to build a similar setup in the United
States, it would take the same time. "Even if we start now, it
would take several years to set up operations," said Chief
Commercial Officer for North America, Jeanelle Teves.
The U.S. currently lacks a specialized manufacturing
footprint for baby strollers that requires advanced tooling,
high-grade materials, and a skilled labor force. "It's not just
about assembling parts; it's about engineering performance and
safety," she said.
In the meantime, Bugaboo decided to pass some of those costs
onto customers, raising prices $50 to $300 on several products
including high chairs, play pens, and a new version the Fox 5
stroller on May 20.
"The increases do not fully offset the tariff, and Bugaboo
is continuing to absorb part of the cost in order to minimize
the impact on American families and retailers," Teves said.
TAKING NOTES
Pensacola, Florida-based Simplified, maker of high-end
notebooks, cards and stationery, can make a day planner complete
with a hard cover, gold corners, foil and color printing for
about $12 in Shenzhen, China, where many U.S.-bound paper
products are made.
After the tariffs hit and small businesses began feeling the
pain, CEO-founder Emily Ley said many people asked why she
didn't just move her manufacturing to the U.S.
"The United States simply does not have the infrastructure,"
said Ley. The problem? Producing the same planner in the U.S.
would cost $38 - and that's with lower-quality materials.
Ley said she keeps her manufacturing costs at 25% of the $64
retail price of the planners. She said she can't pass on the
cost of tariffs, because then her planners would cost $100.
"People aren't gonna pay $100 for a paper planner, nor should
they," said Ley, who has filed a lawsuit against Trump alleging
that his use of emergency powers to enact tariffs was illegal.
In the meantime, Ley is absorbing the cost and continuing
manufacturing in China, which means cutting back on other areas
like investing in growth, jobs, salaries and advertising.
"You know, we're all encouraged to pursue the American dream
and create businesses," Ley said. "The tariffs at any level are
truly punitive. It seems kind of counterproductive to the whole
point of this whole thing."