May 9 (Reuters) - TikTok plans to start labelling images
and video uploaded to its video-sharing service that have been
generated using artificial intelligence, it said on Thursday,
using a digital watermark known as Content Credentials.
Researchers have expressed concern that AI-generated content
could be used to interfere with U.S. elections this fall, and
TikTok was already among a group of 20 tech companies that
earlier this year signed an accord pledging to fight it.
The company already labels AI-generated content made with
tools inside the app, but the latest move would apply a label to
videos and images generated outside of the service.
"We also have policies that prohibit realistic AI that is
not labeled, so if realistic AI (generated contents) appears on
the platform, then we will remove it as violating our community
guidelines," Adam Presser, head of operations and trust and
safety at TikTok, said in an interview.
The Content Credentials technology was spearheaded by the
Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity, a group
co-founded by Adobe, Microsoft ( MSFT ) and others, but
is open for other companies to use.
It has already been adopted by the likes of ChatGPT creator
OpenAI.
YouTube, owned by Alphabet's Google, and Meta
Platforms ( META ), which owns Instagram and Facebook, have also
said they plan to use Content Credentials.
For the system to work, both the maker of the generative AI
tool used to make content and the platform used to distribute
the contents must both agree to use the industry standard.
When a person uses OpenAI's Dall-E tool to generate an
image, for example, OpenAI attaches a watermark to the resulting
image and adds data to the file that can later indicate whether
it has been tampered with.
If that marked image is then uploaded to TikTok, it will be
automatically labeled as AI-generated.
TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance, has 170 million
users in the U.S., which recently passed a law requiring
ByteDance to divest TikTok or face a ban. TikTok and ByteDance
have sued to block the law, arguing it violates the First
Amendment.