Sept 20 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission
sued the country's three largest pharmacy benefit managers on
Friday, accusing them of steering diabetic patients towards
higher priced insulin in order to reap millions of dollars in
rebates from pharmaceutical companies.
The case accuses UnitedHealth Group Inc's ( UNH ) Optum
unit, CVS Health Corp's ( CVS ) CVS Caremark and Cigna Corp's
Express Scripts of unfairly excluding lower cost insulin
products from lists of drugs covered by insurers.
Driving down drug prices has been a key goal for the Joe
Biden administration, and Vice President Kamala Harris, the
Democratic nominee, has emphasized her work for patients, and in
particular on lowering insulin prices, on the campaign trial.
The conduct hurt patients, such as those with coinsurance
and deductibles, who were not eligible for the rebated price.
The three PBMs together administer 80% of all prescriptions in
the U.S., according to the case, which was filed in the FTC's
in-house court.
The suit also named Zinc Health Services, Ascent Health
Services, and Emisar Pharma Services, purchasing organizations
created by the companies in recent years.
Rahul Rao, Deputy Director of the FTC's Bureau of
Competition, said in a statement that the three pharmacy benefit
managers are "medication gatekeepers" that have "extracted
millions of dollars off the backs of patients who need
life-saving medications."
"Millions of Americans with diabetes need insulin to
survive, yet for many of these vulnerable patients, their
insulin drug costs have skyrocketed over the past decade thanks
in part to powerful PBMs and their greed," he said.
The FTC did not sue the three major makers of insulin, Eli
Lilly ( LLY ), Sanofi, and Novo Nordisk,
but it did criticise their role in what it called a broken
system, and said it reserves the right to sue the pharmaceutical
companies later.
The three PBMs have criticised the FTC's approach to the
industry, accusing it of bias. Express Scripts sued the FTC
earlier this week seeking to force it to withdraw a report that
said PBMs enrich themselves at the expense of smaller
pharmacies.