*
OPM probationary staff fired in group call
*
Musk team member enters IRS, raising fears of cuts at tax
collecting agency
*
U.S. embassies abroad told to prepare for staff cuts
*
Termination notices sent to workers at Education
Department and
Small Business Administration
(Adds reference to lawsuit brought by 14 states, details,
paragraphs 2, 6, 7)
By Tim Reid, Nathan Layne and Karen Freifeld
WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. government began
firing hundreds of people at multiple agencies on Thursday as
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk accelerate their purge of
America's federal bureaucracy, union sources and employees
familiar with the moves told Reuters.
Termination emails have been sent in the past 48 hours to
government workers, mostly recently hired employees still on
probation, at the Department of Education, the Small Business
Administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and
the General Services Administration, which manages many federal
buildings.
It was not immediately clear how many domestic federal
workers stood to lose their jobs in the first wave of layoffs.
According to government data, about 280,000 civilian government
workers were hired less than two years ago with most still on
probation, which makes them easier to fire.
All probationary staff at the Office of Personnel
Management, the human resources arm for the U.S. government,
were fired in a group call on Thursday and told to leave the
agency's headquarters in Washington, two sources said.
OPM officials also met with other government agencies on
Thursday and advised them to lay off their probationary
employees, with some exceptions, according to a person familiar
with the matter.
Even as the firings commenced, a group of 14 states filed a
federal lawsuit in Washington alleging that Trump appointed Musk
illegally, giving him "unchecked legal authority" without
authorization from the U.S. Congress.
Most civil service employees can be fired legally only for
bad performance or misconduct, and they have a host of due
process and appeal rights if they are let go arbitrarily. The
probationary employees targeted in Thursday's wave have fewer
legal protections.
Trump and Tesla CEO Musk's overhaul of the federal
government appeared to be widening as Musk aides arrived for the
first time at the federal tax-collecting agency, the Internal
Revenue Service, and U.S. embassies were told to prepare for
staff cuts.
Trump has defended the effort, saying the federal government
is too bloated and that too much money is lost to waste and
fraud. The federal government has some $36 trillion in debt and
ran a $1.8 trillion deficit last year, and there is bipartisan
agreement on the need for government reform. But critics have
questioned the blunt force approach of Musk, who has amassed
extraordinary influence in Trump's presidency.
'YOU ARE NOT FIT'
Thursday's moves fulfill Trump's vow to reduce the size of
the federal government and root out the "deep state," a
reference to bureaucrats he views as not sufficiently loyal to
him.
"The Agency finds that you are not fit for continued
employment because your ability, knowledge and skills do not fit
the current needs, and your performance has not been adequate to
justify further employment with the Agency," letters sent to at
least 45 probationers at the SBA stated.
Reuters has seen a copy of the termination letter.
Letters to at least 160 recent hires at the Department of
Education, also seen by Reuters, told them that their continued
employment "would not be in the public interest."
Trump, a Republican serving his second term, on Wednesday
reiterated his desire to close the Department of Education.
About 100 probationary employees received termination
letters on Wednesday at the GSA, according to two people
familiar with the firings.
One GSA employee, who said he had one month left until his
probation period ended and had been receiving excellent
performance reviews, was told this week he will be fired on
Friday.
"Up until two weeks ago, this was an absolute dream job. Now
it's become an absolute nightmare because of what is going on. I
have small children and a mortgage to pay," the worker told
Reuters.
Musk's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or
DOGE, did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but
a spokesperson for OPM said the firings were in line with new
government policy.
"The Trump administration is encouraging agencies to use the
probationary period as it was intended: as a continuation of the
job application process, not an entitlement for permanent
employment," the spokesperson said.
About 75,000 workers have signed up for the buyout, White
House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. That is
equal to 3% of the civilian workforce.
The deadline to take the offer expired on Wednesday evening.
Asked why workers were not given extra time to consider the
buyout so more would take it, Leavitt said, "I'm not so sure
that we didn't hit the numbers we wanted."
MASSIVE DOWNSIZING
Trump has tasked the South Africa-born Musk and his team at
DOGE, a temporary government agency, to undertake a massive
downsizing of the 2.3 million-strong civilian federal workforce.
Musk, the world's richest person, has sent DOGE members into
at least 16 government agencies, where they have gained access
to computer systems with sensitive personnel and financial
information, and sent workers home.
Gavin Kliger, a top staffer in DOGE, arrived at a new
agency, the IRS, on Thursday, people familiar with the matter
said.
It was the first time a Musk aide has entered the IRS, a
longtime target of Republicans who claim without evidence that
the Biden administration weaponized the agency to target small
businesses and middle-class Americans with unnecessary audits.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration has asked U.S. embassies
worldwide to prepare for staff cuts, three sources familiar with
the matter told Reuters, as part of the president's effort to
overhaul the U.S. diplomatic corps.
Trump has pressed ahead with the effort despite a barrage of
lawsuits from labor unions and Democratic attorneys general and
criticism, including from several Republican budget experts,
that the initiative is ideologically driven.