*
Judge to rule on land transfer by May 14
*
Apache Stronghold opposes mine on religious grounds
*
Rio Tinto sees project as crucial for energy transition
By Ernest Scheyder
May 7 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge said he will rule
by May 14 on whether to block the Trump administration from
transferring Arizona land to Rio Tinto and BHP
to build a major copper mine opposed by Native Americans.
The long-running and complex legal case pits the religious
rights of Arizona's San Carlos Apache people against rising
demand for copper for the energy transition and the geopolitics
of China's wide control over the critical minerals industry.
The dispute centers on the federally owned Oak Flat
Campground where many Apache worship their deities. The site
sits atop a reserve of more than 40 billion pounds (18.1 million
metric tons) of copper, a crucial component of electric vehicles
and nearly every electronic device.
Rio and BHP's Resolution Copper project would, if built,
cause a crater 2 miles (3 km) wide and 1,000 feet (304 m) deep
that would slowly engulf that worship site.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan, who ruled in favor of the
land transfer in 2021, held a nearly two-hour hearing on
Wednesday to consider a fresh request that he block the land
transfer temporarily while the U.S. Supreme Court deliberates.
Logan, an appointee of former U.S. President Barack Obama,
gave little indication as to how he would rule in the week
promised but asked pointed questions about what harm the Apache
could endure if the transfer were to occur before the Supreme
Court rules.
He also asked for data on Rio's maintenance costs for
existing Resolution assets, which a Rio executive estimated at
$11 million a month.
Since 2021, courts have rejected a request by Apache
Stronghold - a nonprofit group that includes the Apache and
others - to block the land transfer needed for the mine. The
rulings deferred to a 2014 decision made by the U.S. Congress
and then-President Obama.
President Donald Trump started the land transfer in his
first term, a move undone by successor Joe Biden while the issue
wound its way through courts.
The U.S. Supreme Court is now considering whether to take
the case. The Supreme Court has said at least 13 times it will
continue to deliberate on the appeal request, an unusually long
time frame.
Meanwhile, Trump last month restarted the land transfer
process, with his administration aiming to complete it as soon
as June 16.
The U.S. Justice Department, which has opposed the Apaches'
request under both Biden and Trump, argued that Logan should
stick with his 2021 ruling.
"There is no basis for this court to issue a different
result here," said Erika Danielle Norman, a Justice Department
attorney.
Apache Stronghold and their attorneys with the Becket Fund
for Religious Liberty said they were encouraged by the
hearing.
"All the Apaches are asking for is to put that land transfer
on hold while the Supreme Court deliberates," said Becket's
Joseph Davis.
Rio Tinto said it appreciated the court's time and that
Resolution is "vital to securing America's energy future,
infrastructure needs, and national defense."
BHP, which owns 45% of the project to Rio's 55%, did not
immediately respond to a request for comment.