April 30 (Reuters) - A group of newspapers, including
the New York Daily News and Chicago Tribune, sued Microsoft ( MSFT )
and OpenAI in New York federal court on Tuesday,
accusing them of misusing reporters' work to train their
generative artificial-intelligence systems.
The eight newspapers, owned by hedge fund Alden Global
Capital's MediaNews Group, said in the lawsuit that the
companies unlawfully copied millions of their articles to train
AI products, including Microsoft's ( MSFT ) Copilot and OpenAI's ChatGPT.
The complaint follows similar ongoing lawsuits against
Microsoft ( MSFT ) and OpenAI, which has received billions in financial
backing from Microsoft ( MSFT ), brought by the New York Times and news
outlets The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet.
An OpenAI spokesperson said on Tuesday that the company
takes "great care in our products and design process to support
news organizations." A spokesperson for Microsoft ( MSFT ) declined to
comment on the complaint.
The newspaper cases are among several potential landmark
lawsuits brought by copyright owners against tech companies over
the data used to train their generative AI systems.
A lawyer for the MediaNews publications, Steven Lieberman,
told Reuters that OpenAI owed its runaway success to the works
of others. The defendants know they have to pay for computers,
chips, and employee salaries, but "think somehow they can get
away with taking content" without permission or payment, he
said.
The lawsuit said Microsoft ( MSFT ) and OpenAI's systems reproduce
the newspapers' copyrighted content "verbatim" when prompted. It
said ChatGPT also "hallucinates" articles attributed to the
newspapers that harm their reputations, including a fake Denver
Post article touting smoking as an asthma cure and a bogus
Chicago Tribune recommendation for an infant lounger that was
recalled after being linked to child deaths.
The plaintiffs also include the Orlando Sentinel, South
Florida Sun-Sentinel, San Jose Mercury News, Orange County
Register and Twin Cities Pioneer Press. They asked the court for
unspecified monetary damages and an order blocking any further
infringement.