(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters.)
By Jamie McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida, Aug 18 (Reuters) - U.S. consumer
spending's surprising resilience is the main reason the economy
has not only avoided recession, but continued to grow at a solid
clip. The big question now is whether American households can
keep that going, especially with higher, tariff-fueled prices
coming down the pike.
In the U.S., "the consumer" is king. Consumer spending
accounts for around 70% of total economic output, so changes in
people's propensity to spend have a direct, outsized influence
on the health of the economy.
But "the consumer" is, of course, actually millions of
people. And when you split them into groups based on income and
wealth, it becomes clear that total spending disproportionately
comes from the rich.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said
earlier this year that the richest 10% of Americans, those
earning at least $250,000 a year, now account for half of all
consumer spending. That's a record. Thirty years ago, the
richest 10% accounted for 36% of all consumer spending.
A Boston Fed paper last week backed up Zandi's findings,
concluding that the strength of aggregate consumer spending in
the last three years is due to high-income earners. But the
authors suggest high-income consumers have a reasonable cushion
because they haven't maxed out their credit cards.
While the lower-income and middle-income cohorts both saw
their credit card debt soar past pre-pandemic totals in the last
few years, wealthier Americans' credit card debt remains below
the 2019 high and well below the level implied by the
pre-pandemic trend. So, if necessary, they still have room to
borrow to fund their spending.
EARNING POWER
Spending across the income deciles could also be supported
by enhanced earning power.
While some indicators show that the U.S. labor market may be
softening, annual average earnings growth still rose in July to
3.9%, meaning real wage growth is running at a 1.3% annual pace,
depending on what slice of inflation you use. Real annual wage
growth has been between 1.0% and 1.8% for over two years, above
the average for the decade leading into the COVID-19 health
crisis.
And overall workers' income may be growing at an even faster
rate, according to economists at Bank of America. They calculate
that aggregate labor income - number of jobs multiplied by wages
multiplied by number of hours worked - increased 5.5% in July on
a six-month annualized basis. Most of that growth was driven by
higher wages.
With household delinquency rates, excluding student loans,
cooling off this year, strength in labor income should continue
to support consumer spending, they argue. This, in turn, should
help the U.S. avoid the recessionary spiral of lower spending
begetting layoffs, begetting even lower spending, begetting more
job cuts.
This is one of the reasons BofA economists retain their
out-of-consensus call that the Federal Reserve won't cut
interest rates at all this year.
FLASHING AMBER?
Others are less confident.
Zandi at Moody's Analytics warns that a correction on Wall
Street would hit the rich hard via the negative wealth effects,
"and, given how weak the economy is, push it into recession."
The concentration of equity ownership at the top of the U.S.
wealth ladder is extreme - the richest 1% in the country owns
50% of stock market assets and the top 10% holds around 90%.
Some measures of household spending are already flashing
amber. Inflation-adjusted spending as measured by personal
consumption expenditures flatlined in the first half of this
year.
Yet figures on Friday showed that retail sales rose 0.5% in
July after an upwardly revised 0.9% gain in June.
But then there are tariffs. Companies, not consumers, have
borne the brunt of these levies so far. Economists at Goldman
Sachs estimate that consumers absorbed only 22% of tariff costs
through June, but they reckon that figure could rise to 67% in
the months ahead if the Trump administration's expected tariffs
are implemented.
So there are grounds for both caution and optimism. Much
will depend on whether the rich draw in their horns.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters)
(By Jamie McGeever
Editing by Paul Simao)