ORLANDO, Florida, Oct 7 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve

says its interest rate cuts are aimed at softening the impact of

a looming labor market rupture. Unfortunately, cheaper money is

unlikely to achieve that goal, but what it almost certainly will

do is fuel the "everything" rally in financial assets.

The reasoning posited by Chair Jerome Powell and the bevy of

doves on the Federal Open Market Committee for pre-emptive

easing is sound enough. Job growth is evaporating, which risks

triggering a spiral of surging unemployment, lower consumption,

and slower growth or even recession.

The problem is the Fed's go-to tool in its armory - the

federal funds policy rate - is a blunt one. This has always been

true, but the risks in using it now are particularly asymmetric

and increasingly skewed towards unwanted outcomes.

This is partly down to the imbalances that have taken root

across corporate, economic and financial America. Consumption is

driven by the richest households, who own most of a booming Wall

Street, where profits, investment and market cap are dominated

by a handful or two of mega companies.

The Fed is easing monetary policy with U.S. financial

conditions the loosest in over three years, credit spreads the

tightest since 1998, inflation a percentage point above target,

and GDP growth running at an annualized rate of around 3% or

higher.

In financial markets, the "everything" rally is in full flow

- Wall Street's big three indices, the Russell 2000 small cap

index, the tech sector, semiconductor stocks, gold, and bitcoin

are all at record highs.

Powell did say late last month that equity prices were

"fairly highly valued", perhaps echoing former Fed Chair Alan

Greenspan's 1996 speech highlighting "irrational exuberance" in

markets at that time. It's worth remembering, however, that the

S&P 500 subsequently doubled and the Nasdaq quadrupled in value

before peaking in March 2000.

There's no suggestion a similar boom - or bust - is on the

cards. But because the wealth effect seems so prevalent, perhaps

the Fed should be factoring financial market conditions into

their decision-making more than they have in the past.

IT'S A 'LOW HIRE, LOW FIRE' LABOR MARKET

Yet that doesn't appear to be the case. The Fed has shifted

its focus towards the employment side of its dual mandate, but

it's not clear how fragile the labor market really is.

Much of the recent spike in jobless claims can be traced to

one-off weather events in certain states and, more importantly,

one of the main reasons job growth has slowed is the Trump

administration's immigration and deportation policies.

Even though policymakers' concerns may be justified, labor

dynamics today are different from years gone by. It is a "low

hire, low fire" job market - job growth is clearly slowing, but

labor supply is shrinking too.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office last month

revised down its January estimates of net immigration this year

by 1.6 million, and lowered next year's forecast by almost 1

million.

This has helped slash the monthly breakeven rate of job growth

needed to keep the unemployment rate steady to well below

50,000, according to St Louis Fed estimates, from over 150,000

at the start of the year.

And it's worth remembering that the unemployment rate is still a

historically low 4.3%. It's unclear whether rate cuts, ven the

additional 100 basis points futures markets expect by the end

of next year, will encourage businesses to hire more workers in

this environment.

As economists at BlackRock point out, that degree of easing

is typically associated with a much starker weakening of the

labor market, inflation, and growth, none of which looks certain

or even likely at this juncture.

BlackRock economists' base case scenario is what appears to

be playing out right now - resilient household incomes spurring

a revival in consumer spending, and the wave of AI-related

investment in tech equipment, software and data centers powering

growth. Markets are reacting accordingly.

According to Chair Powell, the Fed's policy stance is

"modestly restrictive", that is, close to neutral. On balance,

further easing probably risks overheating Wall Street more than

having a discernible positive effect on the labor market.

(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a

columnist for Reuters)