ORLANDO, Florida, May 29 (Reuters) - Few would disagree
that U.S. public finances are deteriorating, but debt Cassandras
have been warning of a fiscal day of reckoning for 40 years and
it has yet to arrive, so why should this time be any different?
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office's baseline
forecast sees federal debt held by the public rising to 117% of
GDP over the next decade from 98% last year, and net interest
payments rising to 4% of GDP, a sixth of all federal spending.
While these eye-watering figures are concerning, it still
seems difficult to fathom the United States experiencing a
genuine debt crisis where investors turn their backs on
Treasuries and the dollar, the two cornerstones of the global
financial system.
Both should enjoy strong demand - at least for the
foreseeable future - even if their prices may need to fall to
attract buyers. And in times of extreme crisis, like 2008 and
2020, the Fed can always buy huge quantities of U.S. bonds to
stabilize the market.
But that doesn't mean investors should ignore the swelling
tide of fiscal gloom. We may not see a full-blown debt crisis,
but there's a sense that "the fiscal" matters for markets more
now than it has for decades.
ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
To better understand the risk at hand, it's useful to
explore the assumptions baked into the current U.S. debt and
deficit projections.
The CBO's comprehensive fiscal projections are a benchmark
for many policymakers and investors. But amid the fog of
uncertainty created by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war,
the baseline economic assumptions underlying this outlook may be
too optimistic.
The CBO assumes that the United States will experience
continuous, uninterrupted economic growth over the next decade.
While it's true that since 1990 the U.S. economy has twice gone
on streaks of more than a decade without experiencing a
recession, conditions today - not the least of which is the
country's bloated public debt burden - suggest that a repeat is
highly unlikely.
And in the event of a downturn, U.S. public finances would
almost certainly suffer the double whammy of shrinking tax
receipts and a surge in benefit payments, pushing the country
closer to a fiscal cliff.
Of course, an economic downturn would probably also prompt
the Fed to lower interest rates, which would likely cause bond
yields to fall and offer some relief on debt-servicing costs.
But investor angst over the debt may keep market-based
borrowing costs higher than they would otherwise be, something
that is also not baked into the CBO's central projections.
And if government borrowing costs over the next decade are
higher than currently projected, the U.S. fiscal picture is even
more troublesome than thought.
YIELD CURVE ASSUMPTIONS
Yield curve assumptions play a major - and often
underappreciated - role in U.S. debt sustainability
projections.
The current CBO projections are based on the expectation
that the yield curve will "normalize" in the coming year. They
assume that the three-month Treasury yield will fall to 3.2% and
the 10-year yield will settle at 3.9%. But what if the yield
curve stays near current levels over the next decade, with a
three-month rate of 4.40% and a 10-year yield of 4.50%?
Chris Marsh at Exante Data crunches the numbers and finds
that, in this scenario, federal debt held by the public could
rise to 125% of GDP by 2034 and interest payments as a share of
revenue would approach 30%.
Interest payments as a share of revenues are already about
to exceed their late-1980s peak and may end up at the highest
level since at least the 1950s.
Adding to this concern, Saul Eslake and John Llewellyn at
Independent Economics note that if the yield curve does not
normalize, the United States could get in the dangerous position
where nominal GDP growth remains persistently below the 10-year
Treasury yield, meaning debt dynamics would deteriorate because
interest payments would outstrip growth.
Given that the Trump administration's current budget bill is
expected to add nearly $4 trillion to the federal debt over the
next decade, the risk of this is especially pertinent today.
One consequence of higher-for-longer U.S. interest rates
then could be a much-heavier-for-much-longer debt burden.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters)