ORLANDO, Florida, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Is the U.S.
economic outlook so weak that it warrants multiple interest rate
cuts? Or are U.S. markets pulling in huge inflows from abroad
because the country's outlook is so attractive?
Both can't be right, yet those are the respective narratives
indicated by current pricing in the rates market and the latest
capital flows data. Something doesn't quite add up.
Much has been written this year about how foreign investors
- spooked by U.S. President Donald Trump's unorthodox, populist
policies - were going to reduce their exposure to U.S. markets
and deploy that capital elsewhere.
But that's not how it is panning out.
Treasury International Capital (TIC) figures last week
showed that foreign investors bought a net $192 billion of U.S.
securities in June. This followed a record net purchase of $326
billion in May, swelled by the largest ever inflow from the
private sector.
Once U.S. investors' purchases of foreign assets are
discounted, the net flow of long-term capital into U.S.
securities in June was still a healthy $151 billion, taking the
total for the second quarter to a record-matching $410 billion.
Zooming out a little further, net inflows in the first half
of this year stood at $643 billion, on course to match the
record $1.3 trillion net inflow from 2022. And in the 12 months
through June, a net $1.27 trillion was poured into U.S. stocks,
Treasuries, agency and corporate debt.
The end of American exceptionalism? It sure doesn't look
like it.
DE-DOLLARIZATION, WHERE ART THOU?
Overseas demand for U.S. assets is clearly strong on an
aggregate level. The explanation may be quite simple: capital
continues to flood into the U.S. because that is where investors
around the world believe they will see the strongest growth and
thus earn the highest returns.
"The flows picture is remarkably robust," says Robin Brooks,
senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "I
don't think you can tell a 'de-dollarization' story or 'end of
U.S. exceptionalism' story from these inflows."
True, there is some justification for the de-dollarization
narrative. The greenback is down 10% year to date, having
recorded its worst start to a year in over half a century.
But most of that slump was in the January-April period. In
the last four months, the dollar index has been essentially
flat.
The dollar's weakness despite the influx of global capital
certainly is a head-scratcher. Anecdotal evidence suggests this
move partly reflects foreigners hedging more of their U.S.
exposure, via currency options and derivatives. Short-term moves
based on a dovish Fed outlook may be at play too.
ULTIMATE HEAD-SCRATCHER
But perhaps an even bigger head-scratcher is the disconnect
between Fed expectations, the U.S. growth outlook, and capital
flows.
Traders expect the Fed to cut rates by around 125 basis
points by the end of next year. That is, by far, the most dovish
expectation for any G10 central bank. History suggests easing on
this scale would only occur if there were a pretty sharp
slowdown in economic growth.
True, there are some red flags in the labor market, parts of
'Main Street' and U.S. public finances, even before factoring in
tariff uncertainty. Yet, overall, the U.S. economy appears to be
in reasonably decent shape. Economists at S&P Global Market
Intelligence on Wednesday raised their 2025 and 2026 GDP growth
forecasts to 1.7% and 2.4%, respectively.
Is that an economy in need of six quarter-percentage point
rate cuts over the coming 16 months, or is the growth outlook
relatively rosy precisely because that level of monetary
loosening is expected?
That remains to be seen. For now, investors around the world
continue to hoover up U.S. securities, which suggests they can't
be all that pessimistic about the U.S. - or at least U.S. tech
companies.
It's worth noting that the TIC data showed the large inflows
in May and June were mostly in so-called riskier equities rather
than 'safer' Treasuries, suggesting foreigners may be more
sanguine about Corporate America than the government.
The end of U.S. exceptionalism may be around the corner, but
it's a long bend.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters)
(By Jamie McGeever
Editing by Kirsten Donovan)