*
MSCI ( MSCI ) to decide by Jan. 15 on excluding digital asset
companies
from indexes
*
Analysts expect other providers to follow suit, dealing
blow to
bitcoin-hoarding sector
*
Crypto-buyers had soared in value, but bitcoin plunge has
hit
some hard
By Elizabeth Howcroft
PARIS, Dec 19 (Reuters) - Michael Saylor's Strategy
could soon be dropped from MSCI ( MSCI ) and potentially other
major stock indexes, which analysts say could cost the
bitcoin-hoarding giant up to $9 billion in demand for its shares
and hurt the wider appeal of the sector.
After queries from clients, MSCI ( MSCI ) in October proposed
ditching from its global benchmarks companies whose digital
asset holdings represent 50% or more of their total assets. It
says they resemble investment funds, which it does not include
in its benchmarks. But many such firms argue that they are
operational companies developing novel products, and that MSCI's ( MSCI )
proposals unfairly discriminate against crypto.
Shares in Strategy, which began life as software firm
MicroStrategy, skyrocketed 3,000% after it began buying bitcoin
in 2020, although they have since fallen sharply, and are
down about 43% this year amid the cryptocurrency's slump.
Dozens more companies have been inspired to buy and hold crypto
tokens on their own balance sheets in the hopes they will gain
value, although questions are growing over the sustainability of
these businesses.
MSCI ( MSCI ) is holding a public consultation and will announce a
decision by January 15. Analysts say that if it excludes digital
asset treasury (DAT) companies, other index providers could
follow.
"The conversation already extends beyond just MSCI ( MSCI )... to the
eligibility of DATs in equity indexes in general," Kaasha Saini,
head of index strategy at Jefferies, told Reuters, adding that
she expects most equity indexes would move to follow MSCI.
STRATEGY: EXCLUSION COULD "CHILL" INDUSTRY
Passive asset managers are estimated to hold as much as 30%
of a large-cap company's free float, according to Saini, meaning
exclusion could trigger significant outflows. That's especially
problematic for the DAT industry, since many companies fund
their token purchases by selling stock.
A spokesperson for Strategy, which has increasingly taken on
debt to fund its token purchases, did not respond to a request
for comment. Saylor this month dismissed worries over potential
MSCI ( MSCI ) exclusion, telling Reuters it wouldn't matter.
But in a subsequent public letter to MSCI ( MSCI ), he and Strategy
CEO Phong Le estimated DAT exclusion would result in $2.8
billion of its stock being liquidated and "chill" the industry.
The proposal would shut DATs out of the roughly $15 trillion
passive-investment universe, "drastically weakening their
competitive position", they wrote.
Analysts at TD Cowen estimated in November that $2.5 billion of
Strategy's market value comes from MSCI ( MSCI ), and $5.5 billion from
other indexes. JPMorgan estimated that Strategy faces $2.8
billion of outflows if MSCI kicks the company out, rising to
$8.8 billion if it is excluded from other indexes, which include
the Nasdaq 100, CRSP US Total Market Index and various
LSEG-owned Russell indexes.
Strategy had a market value of around $45 billion on
Thursday.
CRSP declined to comment. A spokesperson for LSEG said it
continuously monitors client feedback and any methodology
consultations would follow its governance processes.
Nasdaq declined to comment. It kept Strategy in its Nasdaq 100
index during this month's annual reshuffle.
TREASURY COMPANY CRAZE
As of September, at least 200 DATs had a combined capitalisation
of around $150 billion, up more than threefold from a year
earlier, according to law firm DLA Piper. As crypto prices have
dropped, however, some companies have traded below the net asset
value of their tokens.
Besides Strategy, MSCI's ( MSCI ) preliminary list names 38 companies
at risk of exclusion, with a combined issuer market cap of $46.7
billion as of September 30, including French bitcoin-buying
company Capital B.
Alexandre Laizet, Capital B's director of bitcoin strategy,
said the quantity of its shares held by passive funds was "not
that significant now" but in terms of future adoption, it was
"quite important" for the company to have access to passive
flows.
Matt Cole, CEO of U.S. bitcoin-buyer Strive, which
is not on the list, said the proposals have mostly been priced
in by the market.
"On a longer-term basis, I think it raises the cost of
capital for all bitcoin treasury companies," Cole said.