The Federal Reserve is widely expected to keep interest rates unchanged on Wednesday, amid internal divisions over the future path of monetary policy, as President Donald Trump and other White House officials intensify pressure on the central bank.

Trump escalated that pressure on Wednesday morning, following the release of economic data showing US GDP grew at an annualized rate of 3% in the second quarter.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump said: Too late, the rate must be cut now, repeating the nickname hes used this year for Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

Investors will be watching closely to see whether two Fed governors side with Trump and dissent from the monetary policy decision something that hasnt happened in more than three decades. Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman have both publicly made the case for a rate cut at todays meeting.

Michael Feroli, chief economist at JPMorgan, said he expects Waller to dissent, noting that Bowmans stance is less clear. We doubt shell join him in an outright dovish dissent, he added.

Wilmer Stith, lead bond portfolio manager at Wilmington Trust, said one dissent is more likely than two. But he noted, Ultimately, it doesnt change the fact that the Fed funds rate will stay put and the bank will remain patient. Thats the narrative.

This raises another key question for investors: Will Powell hint in his afternoon press conference at openness to a rate cut in September? Traders are currently betting that the Fed will deliver its first rate cut of 2025 at the upcoming September 1617 meeting.

Stith said he believes Powell may offer dovish language laying the groundwork for such a move, following months of criticism from Trump and other administration officials, who are now also pointing to the Feds $2.5 billion headquarters renovation project as further grounds to question Powells leadership.

Given the cost overruns on the [Fed headquarters] project and the ongoing criticism from the administration, I think it weighs on the psyche. A politician might just crack the door open slightly. Before, the door was always shut, said Stith.

Powell has defended the $2.5 billion renovation project, while also emphasizing in recent months the need for more time to assess the inflationary impact of Trumps tariffs.

Many other policymakers agree with Powell, noting that inflation remains above target, inflation risks are still present, and the labor market is close to full employment.

Waller, however, has argued since the June meeting that the tariffs cause only one-time price increases allowing the Fed to look past them and refocus on the employment side of its dual mandate.

He also voiced concern that private-sector job growth is nearing a stall speed. Other data point to rising downside risks in the labor market.

Bowmans rationale for a rate cut lies in recent inflation readings that have come in below expectations, and her belief that trade policy will have only modest effects on inflation.

She also expressed concerns about labor market risks due to signs of weakening employment trends.

Bowmans support for a rate cut marks a shift from her stance last fall, when she opposed a 50 basis point cut in September 2024, citing concerns that inflation was not yet under control.

It would be the first time since December 1993 that two Fed governors dissented in the same meeting. Back then, under former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, Governors Wayne Angell and Lawrence Lindsey opposed the banks dovish policy and favored a rate hike instead.

Of the 61 meetings Powell has presided over, there have been 16 dissenting votes. Fourteen of those came from regional Fed presidents, and only two from Board governors.

In July 2019, there was a rare double dissent from regional Fed presidents, when the Powell-led Fed cut rates for the first time in a decade to counter uncertainty from Trumps first-term tariffs.

Kansas City Fed President Esther George and Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren opposed that cut, arguing that rates should have been left unchanged.

Despite any potential dissents on Wednesday, most observers expect Powell to defend the Feds patient stance for the remainder of 2025.

The Feds not going to do anything, and I think Powell will stick to his guns hes got, frankly, a strong footing to stand on, said Christian Hoffmann of Thornburg Investment Management in comments to Yahoo Finance.