In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft ( MSFT ) in relation to its major competitors in the Software industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
Microsoft ( MSFT ) develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office ( MSFT ), cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
Company | P/E | P/B | P/S | ROE | EBITDA (in billions) | Gross Profit (in billions) | Revenue Growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36.39 | 10.87 | 13.03 | 8.27% | 13.27% | |||
Oracle Corp | 41.66 | 29.75 | 9.09 | 19.27% | 6.4% | ||
ServiceNow Inc | 137.01 | 20.63 | 18.39 | 4.66% | 18.63% | ||
Palo Alto Networks Inc | 112.61 | 18.07 | 15.64 | 3.85% | 15.33% | ||
Fortinet Inc | 41.82 | 39.63 | 12.80 | 25.08% | 13.77% | ||
Gen Digital Inc | 28.67 | 8.07 | 4.68 | 6.43% | 4.77% | ||
Monday.Com Ltd | 308.12 | 14.21 | 15.65 | 2.57% | 30.12% | ||
CommVault Systems Inc | 111.40 | 25.40 | 8.49 | 10.11% | 23.17% | ||
GitLab Inc | 539 | 9.91 | 9.78 | 0.77% | 29.1% | ||
Dolby Laboratories Inc | 28.97 | 2.86 | 5.64 | 3.61% | 1.38% | ||
Qualys Inc | 28.98 | 10.34 | 8.46 | 9.75% | 9.67% | ||
Progress Software Corp | 50.91 | 6.44 | 3.56 | 2.51% | 28.88% | ||
Teradata Corp | 16.15 | 13.78 | 1.30 | 30.24% | -10.11% | ||
Rapid7 Inc | 59.37 | 29.66 | 1.81 | 5.98% | 2.51% | ||
N-able Inc | 103.25 | 2.01 | 3.31 | -0.93% | 3.91% | ||
Average | 114.85 | 16.48 | 8.47 | 8.85% | 12.68% |
table {
width: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;
}
th, td {
padding: 8px;
text-align: left;
}
th {
background-color: #293a5a;
color: #fff;
text-align: left;
}
tr:nth-child(even) {
background-color: #f2f4f8;
}
tr:hover {
background-color: #e1e4ea;
}
td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
text-align: left;
}
.dividend-amount {
font-weight: bold;
color: #0d6efd;
}
.dividend-frequency {
font-size: 12px;
color: #6c757d;
}
When closely examining Microsoft ( MSFT ), the following trends emerge:
A Price to Earnings ratio of 36.39 significantly below the industry average by 0.32x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 10.87, which is well below the industry average by 0.66x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 13.03, which is 1.54x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.27% that is 0.58% below the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $40.71 Billion, which is 66.74x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $48.15 Billion, which indicates 37.62x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
The company's revenue growth of 13.27% exceeds the industry average of 12.68%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating Microsoft ( MSFT ) against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
Among its top 4 peers, Microsoft ( MSFT ) has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19.
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
For Microsoft ( MSFT ) in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios are low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. However, the high PS ratio suggests overvaluation based on revenue. In terms of ROE, Microsoft ( MSFT ) lags behind peers, while its high EBITDA and gross profit margins indicate strong operational performance. Additionally, Microsoft's ( MSFT ) high revenue growth outpaces industry peers, reflecting a positive outlook for future earnings potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.