(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a
columnist for Reuters.)
By Mike Dolan
LONDON, July 1 (Reuters) - In a week of reflection on both a
mad first half of 2026 and the 250th anniversary of the U.S.,
the political and economic news flow has remained relentless,
even if it has lately been drowned out by an AI investment
frenzy that has shifted this year from the big spenders to the
chipmakers supplying the key components.
Today's column takes a different format: a weekly dip into a
few other issues - some related and some not - that caught our
eye over the past week and didn't necessarily make the front
pages.
1) YOUTH BOON OR BURDEN?
America's big anniversary had many investment houses
dwelling on just what made the world's biggest economy what it
is today.
Drawing on Gordon Wood's 2009 book "Empire of Liberty,"
which chroniclesthe early Republic, Morgan Stanley ( MS ) strategist
Andrew Sheets argued this week that chaotic, volatile beginnings
became an economic catalyst, thanks to the new country's unusual
openness, adaptability and capacity for renewal after repeated
crises.
One data point stood out: in 1810, about 70% of Americans
were under 25. Life expectancy was far lower and the population
a fraction of today's, but the figure captures extraordinary
youth and vigour - and raises the question of which emerging or
frontier economies today have a similar demographic profile.
Sub-Saharan African countries such as Uganda, Niger, Mali,
Somalia and Burundi come close, with roughly 70% of their
populations under 25 at last count. Even though emigration
rather than immigration is the dominant pressure in these
countries, and life expectancy is lower than world averages,
could sheer youth spell brighter economic futures?
Many economists are sceptical, arguing that today's world is
very different from the labour-intensive economies of the early
19th century, and that a youth dividend may not be what it once
was.
A Centre for Economic Policy Research paper co-authored by
Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu found that lower birth rates in
recent decades have been associated with higher GDP growth per
working-age adult across countries and stronger wage growth
across U.S. commuting zones - with no negative impact on
aggregate GDP or earnings.
The authors argue this reflects a technological and
innovative response to scarcer young labour. Countries and
regions with lower birth rates, they add, show more
labour-saving patents and growing high-tech activity; it is the
decline in younger populations, rather than overall population
size, that appears to be the driver.
Brave new world indeed - and another hat-tip to the market
obsession of the moment.
2) ADVICE ON WHAT?
Much of the focus on new Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh
has been on how he will react to market expectations that the
next move in Fed interest rates is up. But Warsh himself is
likely concentrating on the five "task forces" he set up last
month to examine the central bank's workings and the broader
conduct of monetary policy.
In that regard, one story that may have passed many people
by was a Wall Street Journal piece saying Warsh had tapped
veteran Fed staff economists Daniel Covitz and Eric Engstrom as
key advisers. Naturally, everyone wants to know what they think
and what they've been working on.
Maybe a guidance-skeptic like Warsh was drawn to Engstrom's
work on the pitfalls of the Fed's quarterly economic and rate
projections. Notably, the pair's most recent joint paper,
published in February, dissected elevated Treasury forward rates
and concluded that the outsize jump in long-dated rates was
rooted more in fiscal concerns than in inflation or worries
about Fed credibility.
Curiously, the Fed site says Covitz's current research
topics include "Asset Bubbles" and "Stability of Short-term
Credit Markets" - timely subjects for a central bank eyeing an
AI frenzy in parts of the financial world. Engstrom's listed
work on "Stock-Bond Comovement" and "Corporate Profits and
Entrepreneurship," meanwhile, speaks to just how much this
year's big themes may shape policy thinking.
3) BROKEN CYCLE?
It's easy to get dazzled by the eye-popping gains in the
stock prices of the big AI beneficiaries - most obviously this
year, chip firms and computing equipment makers. But what looks
like a buoyant midyear for top-line stock market indexes masks
the angst over AI's potential losers, mainly the
software-as-a-service sector.
One way to see that, according to a recent note from
Carlyle's Matthew Savino, is in rising borrowing premia for
these firms in the leveraged loan market. Software spreads of
close to 800 basis points are almost twice the broader index.
They jumped nearly 300 bps early in the year and have not come
back since.
Two points stick out, according to Savino. First, looming
maturity walls mean some $50 billion of syndicated software
loans come due in both 2028 and 2029, and these will need to be
addressed from the second half of this year through 2027. Some
85% of that debt is rated B-minus or lower, and such debt
maturing in 2028-29 has a weighted average price of about 79
cents on the dollar, with more than half trading below 90.
That companies and creditors need to thrash these debts out
is clear. But that leads to the second point: most workouts to
roll or extend debt involve higher spreads, pay-in-kind coupons
or other sweeteners to keep borrowers whole. These generally
assume a cyclical recovery over time.
The problem is that, for some firms, AI disruption may be
existential, complicating traditionally flexible debt
relationships and increasing anxiety for those worst affected.
"In the context of secular distress and high uncertainty
about terminal value, time can be the enemy if the pace of
financial degradation in the underlying business is high,"
Savino concluded. "It's about to get interesting."
(The opinions expressed here are those of Mike Dolan, a
columnist for Reuters.)
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),
your essential new source for global financial commentary.
Follow ROI on LinkedIn, and X.
And listen to the Morning Bid daily podcast on Apple, Spotify,
or the Reuters app. Subscribe to hear Reuters journalists
discuss the biggest news in markets and finance seven days a
week.