ORLANDO, Florida, July 24 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
Key U.S. and global stock markets clocked fresh highs on
Thursday as Alphabet's earnings lifted tech, while investors
digested the European Central Bank's interest rate decision and
the latest signals from the European Union on trade talks with
the U.S.
More on that below. In my column today I ask if the stock
market euphoria around the incoming U.S. trade deals is
warranted. Remember, tariffs will be the highest since the 1930s
and are set to raise inflation and lower growth.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I
recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets
today.
1. ECB keeps rates steady as it awaits clarity over
trade
2. Big central bank rate cuts slow with tariffs and
politics in headlights
3. Conditions as loose as 2021 call into question
more Fed
cuts: Mike Dolan
4. Meme stock surge underlines market froth, mostly
centered on retail investors
5. In earnings season, it's AI good, everything
else, not
so much
Today's Key Market Moves
* S&P 500, Nasdaq, FTSE 100 and MSCI All Country all hit new
highs
again.
* But the Dow and Russell 2000, less tethered to the AI
frenzy,
fall 0.7% and 1.4%, respectively.
* Some big U.S. names post big share price declines on Q2
earnings: Tesla -9%, IBM -8%, Honeywell -5%.
* Oil snaps a four-day losing streak to rise over 1%.
* China's yuan hits its strongest level this year
against
the U.S. dollar, both onshore and offshore.
AI drives new highs
In the absence of major economic data surprises, monetary
policy changes or trade deal news on Thursday, world markets
took their cue from corporate earnings, which continue to point
to strength in artificial intelligence-related activity.
Google's parent company Alphabet grabbed the spotlight, its
second-quarter results highlighting that the heavy investment in
AI is paying off.
Indeed, a trend may be emerging from the earnings season
that shows businesses focused on AI are massively outperforming
companies like airlines, restaurants and food manufacturers that
cater more to actual people. This isn't just a U.S. thing, it's
global.
Of course, this isn't a blanket rule but it will be worth
keeping an eye on as the earnings season progresses. So far at
least, investors are accentuating the positive and major indices
are making new highs on a near daily basis.
On the policy front, the ECB kept its deposit rate on hold
at 2.0% as expected, biding its time while Brussels and
Washington try to negotiate a trade deal that could ease tariff
uncertainty.
It appears that the bar to resume the easing cycle in
September is a high one, and the euro closed the day
little-changed around $1.1765.
The U.S. economic data on Thursday were relatively upbeat,
showing an acceleration in service sector activity and the
lowest jobless claims figures in three months. With numbers like
that, the S&P 500 at a record high and wider financial
conditions loose, the Fed may not be in such a hurry to cut
rates.
And on that score, investors will be paying close attention
to the readout from U.S. President Donald Trump's visit to the
Fed late on Thursday.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to be present during the
visit. It will be an awkward meeting - Trump has repeatedly
demanded that the Fed slash interest rates and has frequently
raised the possibility of firing him. On Tuesday, he called
Powell a "numbskull."
Markets' trade deal euphoria ignores tariff reality
The optimism sweeping world stock markets following news of
emerging and expected U.S. trade deals is undeniable and
understandable. But it is also puzzling.
The S&P 500, Britain's FTSE 100 and the MSCI All Country
index have powered to new highs this week, and other global
benchmarks are not far behind. Analysts at Goldman Sachs and
other big banks have recently been raising their year-end S&P
500 forecasts by as much as 10%.
The catalyst is clear: baseline tariffs on imported goods
into the U.S. will be much lower than the duties President
Donald Trump had threatened previously. It emerged this week
that the levy on Japanese goods will be 15%, not 25%, and
indications are that a deal with the European Union will land on
15% too. That's half the rate Trump had threatened to impose.
Suddenly, the picture is nowhere near as bleak as it looked
a few months ago. Economists reckon that the final aggregate
U.S. tariff rate will settle around 15-20% once deals with
Brussels and Beijing are reached, a level markets are betting
won't tip the economy into recession.
This suggests that Trump's seemingly chaotic strategy -
threaten mutually assured economic destruction, extract
concessions and then pull back to limit the market damage - is
paying off. But will it?
SOMEONE MUST PAY
Despite the market euphoria, the fact remains that on
December 31 last year, the average aggregate U.S. tariff on
imported goods was around 2.5%. So even if that ends up in the
anticipated 15-20% range, it will still be at least six times
what it was only a few months ago, and comfortably the highest
it has been since the 1930s.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimates that tariff
revenues this year could reach $300 billion, which is the
equivalent to around 1% of GDP. Extrapolating last year's goods
imports of $3.3 trillion to next year, a 15% levy could raise
close to $500 billion, or just over 1.5% of GDP.
So who will pick up that tab? Is it the U.S. consumer,
importers or the overseas exporters? Or a mixture of all three?
The likelihood is it will mostly be split between U.S. consumers
and companies, squeezing household spending and corporate
profits. Either way, it's hard to see how this would not be
detrimental to growth.
We may not know for some time, as it will take months for
the affected goods to come onshore and get onto U.S. shelves and
for the tariff revenues to be collected.
"We've got a ways to go before we can really say the U.S.
economy is feeling the full effect of the tariff policies being
announced," Bob Elliott, a former Bridgewater executive and
founder of Unlimited, told CNBC on Wednesday.
But in the meantime, equity investors appear to be ignoring
all of this.
SIGNS OF FROTH
The market's short-term momentum is clear. The S&P 500 has
closed above its 200-day moving average for 62 days in a row,
the longest streak since 1997, according to Carson Group's Ryan
Detrick. And the 'meme stock' craze is back too, another sign
that risk appetite may be decoupling from fundamentals.
Indeed, markets are priced for something approaching
perfection. The consensus S&P 500 earnings growth for next year
is 14%, according to LSEG I/B/E/S, barely changed from 14.5% on
April 1, just before Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff salvo. Even
the 2025 consensus of around 9% isn't that much lower than 10.5%
on April 1.
A Reuters poll late last year showed a 2025 year-end
consensus estimate for the S&P 500 of 6,500. The index is nearly
there already, and is trading at roughly the same multiple as it
was on December 31, a 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio
of 22.
Can these lofty expectations be supported by an economy
whose growth rate next year is expected to be 2% or less?
Possibly. But it will be a challenge for most firms, with the
exception of the 'Magnificent Seven' tech giants whose size
might better shield them from tariffs or slowing growth.
Ultimately, this is all a huge experiment pitting
protectionist trade policy and Depression-era tariffs against
the economic orthodoxy of the past 40 years. And it's yet
another example of equity investors' ability to find the silver
lining in almost anything.
As Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth
Management, says: "'It could have been worse' is not a good
foundation for a market rally".
What could move markets tomorrow?
* Japan Tokyo CPI inflation (July)
* Japan services PPI inflation (June)
* UK GfK consumer confidence (July)
* UK retail sales (June)
* Germany Ifo business sentiment index (July)
* U.S. durable goods (June)
* U.S. Q2 earnings
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday
morning? Sign up for my newsletter here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not
reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust
Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom
from bias.