ORLANDO, Florida, Oct 28 (Reuters) - Another wave of
U.S. tech euphoria lifted Wall Street to new highs on Tuesday,
this time in the shape of a deal between Microsoft and OpenAI, a
day ahead of a clutch of U.S. Big Tech earnings and the Federal
Reserve's policy decision.
In my column today, I look at the U.S. stock markets' record
concentration and the iron grip 'Big Tech' has on Wall Street.
By global standards, however, the U.S. isn't actually that
top-heavy at all.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I
recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets
today.
1. SPECIAL REPORT-Inside the Trump family's global
crypto
cash machine
2. As Trump-Xi trade talks near, investors turn to
history
as a guide
3. Microsoft, OpenAI reach new deal valuing OpenAI
at $500
billion
4. End of Fed QT may offer Treasury convenient
buffer: Mike
Dolan
5. Investors anticipate new wave of Argentine
reforms after
Milei's midterm victory
Today's Key Market Moves
* STOCKS: New highs in Britain, Spain, the big 3
U.S.
indices, and MSCI All-Country. Japan, pan-European benchmarks
ease back after record rally.
* SHARES/SECTORS: Apple hits $4 trillion market cap,
UPS
+8%, Nvidia ( NVDA ) +5%, Microsoft +2%. Only three U.S. sectors rise,
tech's 1.7% gain lifting the wider market. Real estate -2.2%.
* FX: China's spot yuan hits 1-year high through
7.10/$,
Argentine peso slides 3%. In G10 FX Japan's yen +0.5%, sterling
-0.5%.
* BONDS: Treasury yields in tight range, down 2 bps
at
long end to flatten curve. 7-year auction mixed.
* COMMODITIES/METALS: Oil -2%, gold -0.5% to a
three-week
low further below $4,000/oz.
Today's Talking Points
* Tech venture mania
Another strand was added to the tangled U.S. tech and
artificial intelligence ecosystem on Tuesday as Microsoft and
OpenAI reached a deal to allow the ChatGPT maker to restructure
itself into a public benefit corporation, valuing OpenAI at $500
billion.
Many Big Tech firms have commitments, joint ventures, or
tie-ups worth hundreds of billions of dollars with one another.
OpenAI and Nvidia ( NVDA ) are two of the most involved. Skeptics argue
not all will play out as flagged and concentration risk is only
increasing, but for now, they are enough to keep the AI-fueled
market juggernaut going.
* U.S. job losses mount
Amazon and UPS on Tuesday announced combined job losses of
at least 62,000, among the biggest round of publicly confirmed
job cuts in a year that has seen a slow, steady drumbeat of
firms shedding workers.
How much this gets on Fed officials' radar remains to be
seen. But at the very least, and with no economic data being
released due to the government shutdown, it is a sign that the
labor market is weakening, perhaps even more than they have
bargained for.
* Fed to deliver
The Federal Reserve is widely expected to cut interest rates
again on Wednesday by a quarter of a percentage point, and
according to rates futures markets, repeat the move in December
and at least twice more next year. Let's see what signals Chair
Jerome Powell gives about that.
There may also be some big changes around the Fed's balance
sheet and the plumbing of the U.S. banking system, with the Fed
perhaps announcing it will end QT soon. Indeed, this could open
up the possibility of the Fed buying bonds or bills in the near
future.
US stock market concentration is less extreme than you think
With Wall Street scaling fresh peaks and five of the
"Magnificent Seven" U.S. tech giants reporting earnings this
week, investors' focus is once again zeroing in on record-high
stock market concentration and the risks associated with it. But
this concern may be overblown.
This is not a new debate, but it has raged in the last two
years, particularly with the explosion in Nvidia's ( NVDA ) share price.
The chipmaker's market cap has quadrupled since 2023 to $4.5
trillion, lifting the Mag 7's share of the S&P 500 above the 30%
mark.
However, surprising as it may be to many market-watchers,
concentration on Wall Street is not that extreme by global
standards. In fact, the U.S. lags well behind many developed
economies when it comes to equity market concentration, and even
further behind some key emerging economies.
AMERICAN UNEXCEPTIONALISM
When looking at a dozen of the world's largest stock
markets, the U.S. is actually the fifth-least concentrated,
according to Michael J. Mauboussin and Dan Callahan at Morgan
Stanley.
The top 10 U.S. stocks accounted for 33.8% of total market
cap at the end of September this year. Only India, Japan, China
and Canada were less concentrated, while concentration was most
extreme in France, Taiwan and Switzerland.
It should be noted, however, that Taiwan is an outlier,
heavily skewed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the
world's biggest producer of advanced chips. On its own, TSMC
accounts for over 40% of the country's entire stock market cap.
Meanwhile, equity market concentration appears to be
intensifying in key emerging economies, primarily driven by
tech. That was the conclusion of research published this year by
Morningstar's Lena Tsymbaluk and Michael Born.
They analyzed China, Brazil, South Korea, Taiwan and India,
five countries that account for 80% of the Morningstar Emerging
Markets Target Market Exposure Index. Morningstar's Target
Market Exposure indices include a country's or region's 75% most
liquid stocks in terms of trading volume and turnover.
Based on these criteria, the top five stocks at the end of
last year represented 27% of India's market compared with 35% in
China, 46% in South Korea, 47% in Brazil, and 72% in Taiwan. For
comparison, the equivalent shares in Morningstar's U.S., UK and
global TME indexes were 26%, 17.5%, and 33%, respectively.
For all the fretting that Wall Street's eggs are all in the
one Big Tech basket, concentration risk is more extreme in other
countries - something that U.S.-based investors seeking to
diversify their portfolios by going into overseas markets should
perhaps bear in mind.
DOES IT MATTER?
This all raises the inevitable question of whether market
concentration really matters.
To be sure, it is hard to "beat the market" when mega-cap
stocks make outsize gains. That is often the case during periods
of high concentration, as returns tend to be driven by the
handful of stocks at the top rather than all the individual
names underneath.
Look no further than the U.S. for evidence of this. Only 8%
of surviving active funds in the U.S. large-cap blend category
beat the passive alternative over the decade ending June 2024,
according to Morningstar. The Mag 7's footprint in U.S. earnings
and performance is simply too large.
There are also concerns that high concentration increases
risk, given that one is essentially betting on the performance
of a handful of companies.
In the U.S., many worry that the tech bubble - or, more
specifically, the artificial intelligence bubble - will burst.
With valuations so high, Cassandras fear that this top-heavy
market will simply keel over. But obviously none of those
outcomes has come to pass.
Of course, there may be a day of reckoning, but it may not
be for some time. And it is certainly not inevitable, given the
strength of these tech giants' earnings and how entrenched
investors' "buy the dip" mentality has become.
It is ultimately a classic risk-reward dilemma. If you want
a more balanced portfolio, diversify more because a sharp
reversal in tech could trigger an outsized downturn. If you want
to keep enjoying the returns generated by the biggest names,
there is no need to rock the boat.
Currently, the bigger risk may be betting on a reversal too
soon. As the market maxim goes, being too early is the same as
being wrong.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* RBNZ Governor Christian Hawkesby speaks
* Australia inflation (September, Q3)
* Japan consumer confidence (October)
* Canada interest rate decision
* U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate decision
* U.S. Treasury auctions $30 bln of 2-year floating rate
notes
* U.S. earnings, including Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta,
Caterpillar,
Boeing
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday
morning? Sign up for my newsletter here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not
reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust
Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom
from bias.
(By Jamie McGeever;)