April 13 (Reuters) - IPhone maker Apple ( AAPL ) on
Friday denied violating a court order governing its App Store
and urged a California federal judge to reject a request by
"Fortnite" developer Epic Games to hold it in contempt.
Apple ( AAPL ) made the arguments in a filing to U.S. District Judge
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, who presided over Epic's
lawsuit in 2020 accusing Apple ( AAPL ) of violating antitrust law with
its tight controls over how consumers download apps and pay for
transactions within them.
The Apple ( AAPL ) filing criticized what it called an attempt by
Epic to make Apple's ( AAPL ) "tools and technologies available to
developers for free."
Epic, it said, wanted the court "to micromanage Apple's ( AAPL )
business operations in a way that would increase Epic's
profitability."
Epic declined to comment. Apple ( AAPL ) did not immediately respond
to a request for comment about the dispute, part of a long fight
between the two companies.
Epic largely lost its case against Apple ( AAPL ), but Rogers in 2021
ordered Apple ( AAPL ) to give developers greater freedom to guide app
users to alternative payment methods for digital goods.
The U.S. Supreme Court in January declined to hear
Apple's ( AAPL ) appeal of the injunction order.
Epic said in a court filing last month that Cupertino,
California-based Apple ( AAPL ) was in "blatant violation" of the court's
injunction. It pointed to Apple's ( AAPL ) imposition of a 27% fee on
developers for some purchases, which the video game maker said
makes links for alternative payment options "commercially
unusable."
Epic also alleged Apple ( AAPL ) barred some apps from informing
users about other ways to pay for goods.
Meta Platforms ( META ), Microsoft ( MSFT ), Elon Musk's X
and Match Group ( MTCH ) last month echoed Epic's arguments,
telling Rogers that Apple ( AAPL ) was in "clear violation" of the
court's order.
In a similar case that Epic brought against Alphabet's
Google, a judge in San Francisco is expected this year
to issue a separate injunction affecting the Google Play Store.
The case is Epic Games Inc v Apple Inc ( AAPL ), U.S. District Court,
Northern District of California, No. 20-05640.